Truth Based Media

Today, Angel Studios releases an animated adaptation of George Orwell’s Animal Farm in theaters across the country. Conservative parents have a far better option that costs nothing more than a library card and an afternoon of their time. Read the book to your children instead. The novella runs roughly 30,000 words and takes the average reader about two hours to finish. With a child asking questions along the way, you have a three-hour education in the nature of power, the seductions of utopian rhetoric, and the bitter arithmetic of revolution. The film offers something else entirely. The film offers a lie wearing Orwell’s name.The deception begins with the premise. Orwell’s 1945 novella was a surgical attack on Soviet collectivism, written by a man who had personally watched Stalinist factions in Spain hunt and disappear his fellow soldiers. The book ends in calculated horror — the pigs walking on two legs, indistinguishable from the humans they replaced, the animals beneath them no freer than they were under Mr. Jones. There is no rescue. There is no triumphant reformer.Read More: https://truthbasedmedia.com/angel-studios-inverted-animal-farm-and-top-conservatives-took-cash-to-help-promote-the-abomination/

Dr. Mehmet Oz, administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, has issued a direct challenge to every state Medicaid director: prove your providers are legitimate or face consequences. In letters sent this week, Oz demanded comprehensive strategies to revalidate providers, with submissions due within 30 days. States that drag their feet can expect more aggressive federal audits.This move escalates the Trump administration’s broader assault on waste, fraud, and abuse in entitlement programs that have long drained taxpayer resources while delivering questionable value.Read More: https://truthbasedmedia.com/dr-oz-holds-states-accountable-for-medicaids-chronic-fraud-problem/

We used to fill every Friday with the top videos I found during the week. Not sure why we stopped, but we're reviving it today. Let me know at https://jdrucker.com/talk if this is something you'd like to see coming back full time.

Rampant fraud is being discovered in California thanks to independent journalists like Nick Shirley pointing the way for a friendly administration finally willing to act. But the general public is left in the dark as these stories are either dismissed or covered up. This one in particular fits the mold for what should be a slam dunk lede for every major outlet across the country based on how much one man was able to steal, but of course nobody outside of Fox News and a few smaller outlets are covering it.Read More: https://truthbasedmedia.com/the-california-fraud-stories-are-the-biggest-media-coverup-in-years/

When President Trump fired Attorney General Pam Bondi on Wednesday evening — just before delivering his Iran address — Washington’s rumor mill went into overdrive. Leave it to the Daily Mail to pour gasoline on it.The British tabloid, which has a genuine track record of breaking real stories while also sprinkling in speculative garbage, published a claim that Bondi was dismissed at least in part because she tipped off Democratic Congressman Eric Swalwell about FBI Director Kash Patel’s push to release files related to Swalwell’s well-documented ties to Chinese spy Christine Fang — known widely as “Fang Fang.”Read More: https://truthbasedmedia.com/white-house-denies-ludicrous-daily-mail-tabloid-claim-that-pam-bondi-leaked-plans-to-eric-swalwell/

In this Washington Free Beacon article, a leaked audio recording shows Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed explaining why he avoided commenting on the killing of Iran’s Supreme Leader due to political sensitivities among key voter groups.El-Sayed said he stayed silent on the death of Iran’s leader because “a lot of people in Dearborn are sad,” referencing the city’s large Muslim population.The comments were made during a private campaign call and later obtained by reporters.He indicated concern that taking a public stance could alienate voters in a critical Michigan constituency.Dearborn is portrayed as a politically important bloc due to its significant Arab-American and Muslim demographics.El-Sayed allegedly suggested redirecting media questions toward attacks on Donald Trump instead of addressing the issue directly.The remarks highlight how foreign policy events can intersect with domestic electoral strategy.The leak has sparked criticism and raised questions about candidate transparency and priorities.The situation unfolds amid a competitive Democratic primary for Michigan’s open Senate seat.Read the full story: https://freebeacon.com/democrats/there-are-a-lot-of-people-in-dearborn-who-are-sad-democratic-senate-hopeful-abdul-el-sayed-said-he-needed-to-stay-silent-on-khamenei-killing-because-many-of-michigans-muslim-voters/

* President Donald Trump stated that Iran has agreed to never possess nuclear weapons, describing it as a core condition for ending the ongoing conflict.* Trump emphasized the point repeatedly, calling it “number one, two and three” during remarks to reporters.* Tehran has not publicly confirmed any such agreement and Iranian officials have denied active negotiations with the United States.* The statement comes amid reports of indirect talks, a U.S. decision to postpone further strikes on Iranian energy infrastructure, and efforts to secure a broader deal.* Background includes prior U.S.-Israeli military actions against Iran, concerns over enriched uranium stockpiles, and demands that go beyond nuclear issues.* Trump indicated optimism about “major points of agreement” while stressing verification and enforcement would be essential.* Markets reacted with falling oil prices following the comments, reflecting hopes of de-escalation.* The situation remains fluid, with Iranian denials raising questions about the precise status of any commitments.President Donald Trump declared Monday that Iran has conceded on the central U.S. demand in the current conflict: a permanent end to any pursuit of nuclear weapons.Speaking to reporters in Florida, the president left little room for ambiguity. “They’ve agreed,” he said. “They will never have a nuclear weapon. They’ve agreed to that.” He repeated the assertion for emphasis, adding that preventing a nuclear Iran stands as “number one, two and three” in any resolution.Some reports indicate skepticism about Iran’s willingness to abandon the program they have worked so diligently to build for decades. They are bound by a religious call to deceive “infidels” if it suits their purposes, which would align with years of claims that they were not pursuing nuclear weapons when it was blatantly obvious they were.The timing matters. Trump had recently postponed planned U.S. strikes on Iranian energy facilities, citing productive conversations. Those talks, according to the administration, involve multiple channels, including figures such as Jared Kushner and envoy Steve Witkoff. Reports suggest a potential framework covering not only the nuclear file but also the Strait of Hormuz, ballistic missiles, and sanctions relief.Iranian officials pushed back sharply. Tehran has publicly denied holding direct negotiations with Washington and dismissed aspects of Trump’s account as inconsistent with their position. A senior Iranian figure claimed no ongoing talks exist, while others labeled the statements an attempt to shape perceptions or markets.This latest development unfolds against a backdrop of heightened tensions that escalated earlier in 2026. U.S. and Israeli strikes targeted Iranian assets following the collapse of earlier diplomatic windows. The conflict has already claimed high-level Iranian leadership figures and drawn in regional actors. Trump’s administration has justified military pressure in part by pointing to Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile and fears that the regime could cross the threshold to weaponization.Yet the president has also signaled a preference for resolution through strength rather than prolonged war. He described Iran as wanting a deal “very badly” and suggested the United States stands ready to retrieve enriched uranium as part of any final arrangement. Details remain sparse on exact mechanisms—whether full dismantlement of facilities at Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan, unrestricted IAEA access, or phased ballistic missile limits—but the nuclear prohibition forms the unmistakable red line.Skeptics note that Iran has long maintained its nuclear program serves civilian purposes and has pointed to a religious fatwa against weapons of mass destruction. U.S. intelligence assessments have varied over the years on the extent of active weaponization efforts. Trump’s first-term withdrawal from the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action reflected deep distrust in that earlier framework, which he argued only delayed Iran’s ambitions without eliminating them.What distinguishes the current moment is the combination of military leverage and renewed diplomacy. By postponing additional strikes, the administration created space for dialogue. Trump indicated that nearly all points in a proposed understanding align, though he stopped short of declaring victory. “We’ll see where they lead,” he remarked, while underscoring that any outcome must deliver verifiable, irreversible steps.The economic signal arrived quickly. Oil prices dropped sharply on the news, with Brent crude falling more than 10 percent at one point, as traders weighed the possibility of restored stability in the Gulf and resumed energy flows.Still, the gap between announcement and implementation looms large. Without public Iranian acknowledgment, questions persist about whether the reported concession reflects a formal commitment, a negotiating posture, or an interpretation of private assurances. History offers cautionary examples: past rounds of talks produced temporary freezes only to unravel under sanctions, mistrust, or shifting regional power dynamics.For the United States and its allies, particularly Israel, the stakes could hardly be higher. A nuclear-armed Iran would reshape the Middle East balance, threaten global energy security, and challenge longstanding nonproliferation norms. Trump has framed his approach as realism rooted in maximum pressure followed by clear-eyed deal-making. He has avoided the language of regime change in recent statements but has not ruled out continued military options if talks falter.Observers across the spectrum will watch the coming days closely. Will Iranian representatives confirm elements of the nuclear concession? Can mediators bridge remaining differences on missiles, proxies, and sanctions? And will any agreement include robust verification that prevents future breakout capability?President Trump’s assertion marks a potentially pivotal turn in a dangerous confrontation. If the reported Iranian agreement holds and leads to a durable settlement—one that truly ends the nuclear threat while addressing broader destabilizing activities—it could spare further bloodshed and recalibrate security across the region. If the gap between words and deeds widens, however, the cycle of escalation may resume.For now, the president projects confidence that diplomacy, backed by demonstrated resolve, can deliver what previous efforts could not: an Iran permanently barred from acquiring the ultimate weapon. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit truthbasedmedia.substack.com

For years, mainstream dietary advice painted certain whole foods as villains—blamed for heart disease, weight gain, and more. Much of this stemmed from flawed studies, often influenced by processed food industries pushing low-fat alternatives loaded with sugar. The outcome? Rising chronic illness despite “following the rules.” It’s time to reclaim nutrient-dense foods that humans have thrived on for generations.The biggest myth targeted saturated fats and dietary cholesterol, with no solid evidence linking them directly to heart disease in independent research. Sugar and refined carbs are the real drivers of inflammation and metabolic chaos. This shift frees us to embrace natural fats and cholesterol sources that support hormones, brain health, and cell repair—far superior to processed substitutes.Beyond fats, nutrient powerhouses like organ meats were dismissed as “gross” or too calorie-dense, while antioxidant-rich items faced scrutiny over sugar or caffeine. In reality, these deliver highly bioavailable vitamins, minerals, and protective compounds missing from modern processed diets. Choosing them prioritizes nutrient synergy over simplistic calorie math, promoting real prevention and vitality.Here are 10 foods you were once warned against—now recognized as nutritional stars when sourced well and enjoyed in balance:* Coconut oil — Its medium-chain triglycerides act as an antimicrobial and quick energy source, boosting metabolism and immunity without the feared heart risks from saturated fats.* Egg yolks — Packed with highly absorbable choline for brain function and true vitamin A; dietary cholesterol has little effect on blood levels compared to excess sugars.* Grass-fed beef — Offers superior bioavailable iron, zinc, and creatine for energy and muscle support, with no proven direct connection to heart disease unlike processed meats.* Organ meats — The ultimate in nutrient density, providing vitamins and minerals in their most usable forms to correct widespread deficiencies from processed eating.* Liver — Nature’s true multivitamin, loaded with real vitamin A, complete B vitamins, and copper to rebuild energy, immunity, and mineral reserves.* Sardines — An affordable omega-3 and vitamin D powerhouse, plus calcium from edible bones—ideal for brain, bone, and anti-inflammatory benefits.* Nuts — Deliver vitamin E, selenium, and magnesium for heart protection and fullness; their advantages far outweigh old calorie-counting concerns in reasonable portions.* Dark chocolate (70%+ cacao) — One of the planet’s richest antioxidant sources, combating inflammation and DNA damage—skip added sugars for maximum benefit.* Coffee — Supplies abundant antioxidants tied to lower risks of type 2 diabetes and brain diseases; daily moderate use can be genuinely protective.* Bananas — Rich in potassium and fiber to steady blood sugar and pressure; a convenient, whole-food carb that fits smart, balanced nutrition.Adding these thoughtfully upgrades meals from restrictive to genuinely nourishing. Opt for high-quality sources—grass-fed, wild-caught, or organic—and try simple preparations to savor their natural taste without overcomplicating things.Ditching outdated dietary fear-mongering for honest, unprocessed eating restores true health autonomy. As awareness grows about corporate-driven misinformation, the route to wellness becomes straightforward: trust time-tested, nutrient-packed foods already on your plate. Feed your body what nature designed, not what profit motives promote.Article inspired by Natural News. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit truthbasedmedia.substack.com

In the midst of a partial government shutdown that began on February 14, 2026, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) finds itself at the center of a heated political battle. Funding for the agency lapsed after Congress failed to reach an agreement, leaving over 260,000 employees in limbo across agencies like TSA, FEMA, and the Coast Guard. While essential immigration enforcement operations by ICE and CBP continue uninterrupted—thanks to a massive $140 billion infusion from last year’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act—the impasse has exposed deep divisions over immigration policy.Yet, legacy media outlets like CBS News are spinning the narrative in a way that downplays the core issues, focusing instead on superficial demands to paint Democrats as reasonable reformers.CBS News has repeatedly highlighted Democrats’ calls for immigration agents to wear body cameras, display identification, and refrain from wearing face masks during operations. Headlines and segments emphasize these “accountability measures” as the primary sticking points, framing the shutdown as a fight over transparency and safety for agents and the public alike.This portrayal suggests a commonsense push for better practices, especially in the wake of incidents like the Minneapolis shootings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti by immigration officers last month. But this is classic gaslighting—diverting attention from the Democrats’ more radical demands that could cripple enforcement efforts.Other media echoes this sentiment. Reports describe Democrats’ agenda as simply requiring agents to “identify themselves” and banning masks to end “secret police” tactics. It’s presented as a moderate response to public outcry, with little mention of how these elements are bundled with far-reaching changes. The result? A public perception that the shutdown is about minor procedural tweaks, not a fundamental overhaul of immigration law.At the heart of the Democrats’ demands lies a push to replace administrative warrants—long-standing tools used by ICE for efficient deportations—with judicial warrants for arrests on private property. Administrative warrants, authorized under the Immigration and Nationality Act, allow agents to act swiftly without needing a judge’s approval for every action. Requiring judicial warrants would add layers of bureaucracy, greatly delaying operations and allowing targets to evade capture. This isn’t about accountability; it’s about hamstringing ICE’s ability to enforce existing laws, especially amid the Trump administration’s mass deportation initiatives. FactCheck.org and PBS News coverage confirms this as a central Democratic demand.Democrats argue that judicial warrants protect everyday Americans from overreach, citing the need to verify citizenship before detentions and end practices based on race, language, or accent. But this ignores that current protocols already include safeguards, and the change would effectively rewrite immigration enforcement from the ground up. By burying this demand under talk of masks and badges, Democrats and their media allies are engaging in deliberate misdirection, gaslighting the American public into believing the fight is over optics rather than operational paralysis.Republicans, for their part, have been frustratingly passive in countering this narrative. While they’ve warned that Democrats’ demands would make agents “totally vulnerable” and disrupt national security, they’ve failed to aggressively highlight the warrant issue as the real threat. Instead of mounting a full-throated defense in press conferences or on social media, GOP leaders have stuck to procedural votes and vague statements about urgency amid external threats like the war with Iran. This reluctance to fight back allows the gaslighting to persist unchecked.As the shutdown drags into its second week with no resolution in sight, the American people deserve transparency about what’s truly at stake. Here are the key ways legacy media and Democrats are distorting the debate:* Focus on Face Masks: Media outlets emphasize banning masks as a “masks off” policy for accountability, but it’s a red herring that distracts from how it could expose agents to greater risks without addressing core enforcement tools. See CBS News reporting.* Name Badges and Body Cameras: Framed as simple identification requirements, these are portrayed as harmless reforms, yet they’re packaged with demands that could slow down deportations nationwide.* Downplaying Judicial Warrants: The push to mandate court-approved warrants is rarely headlined, allowing the narrative to shift away from how this would bog down ICE in legal hurdles and undermine border security. Democrats have explicitly tied this to funding, per LA Times coverage.* Ignoring Republican Concerns: Coverage often omits GOP arguments that these changes tie immigration policy to funding, risking disruptions to critical operations beyond immigration.If Republicans continue to sit on the sidelines, the gaslighting will only intensify, potentially leading to concessions that weaken America’s immigration system for years to come. It’s time for a real fight over the facts, not the facade. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit truthbasedmedia.substack.com

The recent press conference by Jeanine Pirro, serving as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, has sparked speculation in media circles about her ambitions within the Trump administration’s Justice Department.On Friday, Pirro held a combative session with reporters, strongly criticizing a federal judge’s decision to quash subpoenas targeting Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell in an ongoing criminal investigation related to renovation cost overruns. She labeled the ruling “outrageous” and called the judge an “activist” who had improperly inserted himself into the case, vowing that the Department of Justice would appeal.CNN’s chief legal correspondent Paula Reid analyzed the event on-air, describing Pirro’s performance as unusually aggressive and strategic. Reid suggested it resembled “an audition” for the top job at the Justice Department—Attorney General—currently held by Pam Bondi. She pointed to reports that Bondi is on “thin ice” with the White House and President Trump, who has voiced ongoing frustration with DOJ prosecutors for failing to secure successful cases against his political adversaries.This context frames Pirro’s fiery defense of the investigation and her direct attacks on the judiciary as potentially calculated to align closely with the president’s expectations. As a longtime Trump ally—known from her Fox News tenure and prior roles—Pirro’s appointment as interim U.S. Attorney for D.C. already positioned her prominently within the administration’s legal apparatus. Her presser performance amplified perceptions that she is signaling readiness for higher responsibility if Bondi’s tenure falters.Bondi, confirmed as Attorney General earlier in Trump’s term, has faced scrutiny for not achieving high-profile arrests. Reports indicate internal tensions, including dissatisfaction over prosecutorial outcomes, which could create openings for figures like Pirro who demonstrate unwavering loyalty and assertiveness.* Pirro’s aggressive stance: By slamming the judge and committing to an appeal, she showcased a no-holds-barred approach to investigations that resonates with Trump’s criticisms of the justice system.* Bondi’s precarious position: Multiple sources note White House frustrations with the AG, potentially tied to perceived shortcomings in high-profile prosecutions.* Reid’s pointed analysis: The CNN correspondent highlighted Pirro’s awareness of the political dynamics, framing the press conference as a deliberate bid for visibility and favor.* Broader implications: This episode underscores ongoing tensions within the DOJ under the current administration, where loyalty and results appear to weigh heavily in personnel considerations.While no official moves have been announced regarding leadership changes at the Justice Department, the speculation fueled by Reid’s comments highlights the high-stakes environment surrounding federal prosecutions and executive expectations.Pirro’s outspoken style during the presser—defending the probe into Powell and rejecting claims of political motivation—may indeed strengthen her standing among those prioritizing aggressive action against perceived institutional resistance.Observers will likely watch for further developments, including the outcome of any DOJ appeal and additional signals from the White House on Bondi’s role. In the interim, the incident serves as a reminder of how public statements by key legal figures can quickly become interpreted through the lens of internal power dynamics. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit truthbasedmedia.substack.com

The sudden death of Iran’s longtime Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in a U.S.-Israeli airstrike on February 28 has thrown the Islamic Republic into uncharted territory. His son, Mojtaba Khamenei, was swiftly elevated to the position on March 9, but persistent reports suggest the 56-year-old cleric may be in a coma, severely wounded from the same barrage that claimed his father’s life. If true, this raises profound questions about who truly holds the reins in Tehran—potentially handing de facto control to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the regime’s most hardline military faction. Amid an escalating war and an internet blackout across Iran, these developments could reshape the Middle East’s power dynamics, testing the resolve of the United States and its allies.Mojtaba Khamenei’s ascension was announced with the regime’s characteristic opacity. State media portrayed it as a seamless transition, emphasizing continuity in the face of external aggression. Yet, within days, whispers from dissident sources and international outlets painted a starkly different picture.According to information relayed to an Iranian exile in London, Mojtaba is under intensive care at Sina University Hospital in Tehran, where an entire wing has been cordoned off under heavy guard. Trauma specialists, including prominent surgeon Mohammad Reza Zafarghandi, have reportedly described his condition as critical, with injuries including the loss of at least one leg and possible damage to internal organs like the stomach or liver.These claims align with admissions from Iranian officials themselves. The regime’s ambassador to Cyprus, Alireza Salarian, confirmed to Western media that Mojtaba was injured in the strikes, suffering wounds to his legs, hand, and arm. State television acknowledged the injuries but downplayed them, insisting he remains “safe and sound.” However, the absence of any public appearance, photograph, or video from Mojtaba since his appointment fuels skepticism. In a nation where the Supreme Leader’s image is omnipresent, this silence speaks volumes.On March 12, Iranian state media broadcast what they claimed was Mojtaba’s first official message as Supreme Leader. Read aloud by an anchor against a backdrop of a waving Iranian flag, the statement vowed revenge for the “martyrs” and demanded the closure of all U.S. bases in the region.“We will extract compensation from the enemy,” it declared, “and if they refuse, we will seize as much of their assets as we deem appropriate. If that is not possible, we will destroy an equivalent amount of their assets.” It also threatened attacks on facilities in Gulf states while professing a desire for “friendship with neighbors” and celebrated the “resistance front” as core to the Islamic Revolution’s values.The timing of this message—coinciding with the surge in coma rumors—has only intensified doubts. Dissident journalist Ehsan Karami, formerly with Iranian state media, asserted that Mojtaba is connected to a ventilator and unaware not only of his elevation but of the war’s toll on his family. Similar reports from outlets like The Sun and Modern.az describe him as comatose, suggesting the statement may have been fabricated or prepared in advance by regime handlers. If Mojtaba is indeed incapacitated, the document’s aggressive tone could reflect the priorities of those pulling the strings behind the scenes.Enter the IRGC, Iran’s elite paramilitary force known for its iron grip on security, economy, and foreign adventurism. Observers have long noted Mojtaba’s close ties to the Guards, where he wielded influence in the shadows during his father’s rule. But with Ali Khamenei’s death and Mojtaba’s alleged injuries, some analysts argue the IRGC has orchestrated a quiet coup. Sources within the Iranian diaspora claim the Guards forced through Mojtaba’s selection as a pliable figurehead, allowing them to operate without the clerical establishment’s full oversight. This would mark a shift from the mullahs’ traditional dominance to a more militarized autocracy.Social media buzz and anonymous leaks amplify this narrative. Posts on platforms like X describe a “major, silent power shift,” with IRGC commanders now running daily affairs while using Mojtaba’s name to maintain legitimacy. One account, citing unverified Iranian contacts, alleged that the Guards are committed to propping up the illusion of his leadership—likening it to a macabre farce. While these remain unconfirmed, they echo patterns seen in other authoritarian regimes where military factions exploit leadership vacuums.The broader implications are dire. Iran’s war machine, already strained by the ongoing conflict dubbed the “Ramadan War,” could become even more unpredictable under IRGC dominance. The Guards have a history of aggressive proxy warfare through groups like Hezbollah and the Houthis, and a leaderless or puppet regime might escalate strikes on U.S. interests or Israeli targets. President Donald Trump has already deemed Mojtaba “unacceptable,” signaling potential for further U.S. involvement. Israel, meanwhile, has vowed to target any successor perpetuating the threat.Yet, not all reports agree on the severity of Mojtaba’s condition. Reuters sources indicated he survived the assaults with lighter injuries, and some Iranian officials, like adviser Yousef Pezeshkian, have publicly affirmed his well-being. This discrepancy highlights the information warfare at play: the regime’s efforts to project strength versus dissidents’ attempts to expose fragility. In Tehran, where protests have simmered for years, news of a comatose leader could ignite unrest, especially under the current blackout that stifles communication.Historical precedents abound. Iran has weathered leadership crises before, but none amid open war. Ali Khamenei’s own rise in 1989 followed the death of Ruhollah Khomeini, but without the specter of foreign bombardment. If the IRGC is indeed in charge, it could harden Iran’s stance, rejecting negotiations and doubling down on nuclear ambitions or regional sabotage. Observers recall how past “conspiracies”—like the regime’s hidden nuclear program—were dismissed until proven true, urging caution against outright rejection of these claims.Moral clarity demands acknowledging the human cost. The strikes that felled Ali Khamenei also claimed other family members, underscoring the brutality of this conflict. For ordinary Iranians, long oppressed by the regime’s theocracy, a power struggle at the top offers little relief. Many yearn for freedom from both internal tyranny and external threats, but the IRGC’s ascendance might only entrench repression.As the dust settles, the world watches Tehran closely. If Mojtaba emerges publicly, it could dispel the rumors and stabilize the regime. But prolonged absence would confirm suspicions of a deeper malaise. The Guards’ potential takeover isn’t just an internal affair; it threatens to export more chaos to the Gulf, Levant, and beyond.Investigative threads point to a regime in disarray. Dissident networks, operating at great risk, continue to smuggle out details despite the blackout. Their accounts, cross-referenced with official slips, build a compelling case for scrutiny.Ultimately, the truth about Mojtaba’s status may only surface through actions on the ground. If Iran ramps up attacks—as hinted in the purported statement—it signals the IRGC’s unbridled influence. Conversely, a de-escalation could indicate internal negotiations or weakness.For now, the Islamic Republic teeters on the edge. A comatose Supreme Leader would symbolize the regime’s vulnerability, inviting both internal dissent and external pressure. The IRGC, with its vast resources and fanaticism, stands ready to fill any void—potentially at great peril to global stability.This moment tests the resilience of Iran’s adversaries. The U.S. and Israel must navigate carefully, distinguishing between verified intelligence and propaganda. But one thing is clear: the era of Ali Khamenei’s iron rule is over, and what replaces it could be even more dangerous. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit truthbasedmedia.substack.com

For the first time in modern polling history, fewer than half of Americans — just 47% — say religion is "very important" in their lives.Religious "Nones," those with no formal religious affiliation, have reached a record high of 24%, up from just 2% in 1948.57% of Americans now say they seldom or never attend religious services, up from 42% in 1992.Young adults are the least religious demographic, with 35% identifying as "Nones" and 61% rarely or never attending services.Black Americans have experienced the steepest decline of any group, dropping from 85% calling religion very important in 2001–2005 to 63% by 2021–2025.Republicans have held relatively steady at 64% saying religion is very important, while Democrats have plummeted from 60% to 37% over two decades.Experts say there is no data suggesting a reversal, with generational replacement driving a long-term structural decline in American religious life. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit truthbasedmedia.substack.com

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei publicly apologized after a leaked internal memo — in which he accused the Trump administration of wanting "dictator-style praise" — torpedoed ongoing negotiations with the Pentagon and drew a sharp White House response.The dispute traces back to a $200 million Pentagon contract Anthropic signed in July 2025, which included two usage restrictions: no fully autonomous weapons targeting and no mass domestic surveillance of Americans. The Pentagon demanded those clauses be removed.Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth formally designated Anthropic a "Supply-Chain Risk to National Security" — the first time in U.S. history that label has been publicly applied to an American company — and President Trump ordered all federal agencies to immediately cease using Anthropic's technology.Legal experts say the designation is on shaky ground, because the statutes authorizing it require an intelligence-driven technical finding of actual risk — not a punitive response to a vendor that refused to renegotiate contract terms, which is how the administration framed it publicly.OpenAI signed a deal with the Pentagon hours after Anthropic walked away, but its revised agreement ultimately included the same two restrictions Anthropic had demanded — raising serious questions about whether the White House's real grievance was ever about the clauses themselves.Elon Musk — whose xAI is a direct Anthropic competitor and recently signed its own Pentagon deal — amplified attacks on Anthropic via X, and Senator Mark Warner publicly questioned whether national security decisions were being driven by careful analysis or by competitive and political considerations.Despite being officially banned, Claude was actively being used to support U.S. military operations against Iran at the time of the designation — a contradiction that captures the central tension of the entire dispute: the government's most advanced AI tool is now officially its declared enemy.Read More: https://truthbasedmedia.com/dario-amodei-apologizes-after-leaked-memo-but-the-damage-is-already-done-and-the-fight-is-just-beginning/ This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit truthbasedmedia.substack.com

Arkansas Father’s Fight for Justice Leads to Stunning Primary Victory - https://truthbasedmedia.com/arkansas-fathers-fight-for-justice-leads-to-stunning-primary-victory/Hundreds of Kurdish Fighters Launch Ground Offensive in Iran - https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-888881Justice Jackson Authors Unanimous SCOTUS Opinion Handing Trump an Immigration Win - https://www.foxnews.com/politics/justice-jackson-authors-unanimous-scotus-opinion-handing-trump-immigration-winSegment Sponsor: Advisor Bullion - https://patriot.tv/gold This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit truthbasedmedia.substack.com

Johnson says preemptive strike stopped ‘staggering’ US casualties - https://www.foxnews.com/live-news/iran-war-trump-israel-khamenei-march-2“Israel was determined to act in their own defense here, with or without American support,” he said. “Israel faced what they deemed to be an existential threat. Iran was building missiles at a radical, and at a rapid clip, to the point where our allies in the region could not keep up, as you know, Iran, has, long vowed to take out Israel, wipe it off the map.”“Because Israel was determined to act with or without the US, our commander in chief and the administration and the officials…had to evaluate the threats to the US, to our troops, to our installations, to our assets in the region and beyond,” Johnson continued. “If Iran had begun to fire all of their missile arsenal – short and mid-range missiles – at our personnel and our assets and our installations, we would have suffered staggering losses, and if we had waited to respond before acting first, then those losses would have been far greater than if we had done what we did. That was their decision.”Iran starts ‘indiscriminate’ strikes across Gulf of Oman, hits shadow tanker tied to regime - https://www.foxnews.com/world/iran-starts-indiscriminate-strikes-gulf-oman-hits-shadow-tanker-tied-regime This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit truthbasedmedia.substack.com

It's bad enough that Mayor Karen Bass continues to obliterate any semblance of leadership when it comes to the Pacific Palisades fires from over a year ago. Now, they're trying to raise funds by conning the people with brush fees.The incompetence of the Los Angeles government is apparent based on a simple RV story that shouldn't be so complicated.Lastly, there's apparently poop on buses and that's a bad thing. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit truthbasedmedia.substack.com

The CJNG cartel in Mexico responded to the killing of their leader with attacks across the nation over the weekend and law enforcement seemed unable to do much about it. Now, they're sending in the military.In the Middle East, Saudi Royals are calling for more than just targeted attacks or a nuclear deal with Iran. They want the Ayatollah and his entire regime replaced.At Mar-a-Lago, a text message to a co-worker by Austin Tucker Martin points to the Jeffrey Epstein cover-up being the reason he went with a shotgun and a gas can. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit truthbasedmedia.substack.com

New Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger is already making a splash by proving her campaign narrative that she's a moderate is a total lie. Congressman Brandon Gill is quickly proving to be a firebrand in the party. John Brennan may finally be facing justice soon. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit truthbasedmedia.substack.com