Good in Theory

PODCAST · science

Good in Theory

Good in Theory is a podcast about brilliant scientific theories—that just happened not to be true. Join Rita and Sofie as they dive headfirst into disproven theories across biology, chemistry, physics, and medicine. They'll unpack what made the ideas so compelling, where they spectacularly failed, and how they still managed to leave a fascinating mark on science and culture. Have a listen if you want to learn about wacky, wrong, and weirdly impactful science history alongside two enthusiastic guides!

  1. 16

    Steady state theory: A sign of the universe

    Is the universe infinite? Was there a beginning of time? Einstein himself preferred to think of the universe as unchanging, having neither beginning nor end. Experiments showed the expansion of the universe, proving Einstein wrong. Given this new evidence scientists had two choices: either the universe started in an incredibly dense state and expanded, diluting to the density we observe today (the big bang model) or even though it is expanding there is a mechanism keeping the density of the universe constant, so that the overall appearance of the universe stays the same (the steady state model). More and more evidence favouring the big bang model was found, but some cosmologists clung tight to the idea of the steady state theory. Take some time to listen to this week’s episode of Good in Theory!

  2. 15

    Neptunism: The ocean rocks

    How do rocks form? Neptunism is a theory that suggests all rocks formed in a primeval ocean through sedimentation. Proponents claimed this could explain why we find different types of rock in different layers of the earth. Volcanic phenomena were dismissed as being newer in earth's history and not relevant for understanding most rocks we can observe. While intriguing, this theory did not stand the test of time as other types of rock formation were shown to be significant. Dive in and listen to this week’s episode of Good in Theory!

  3. 14

    Recapitulation theory: Your inner fish

    At an early stage of development human embryos have gill-like features. Observations like this prompted scientists to suggest that embryo development copies the evolutionary development of the species. Their theory became known as recapitulation theory and had the slogan “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny”. Many scientists, such as Charles Darwin, disagreed with recapitulation theory even though they agreed that embryos of different species share a lot of similarities. Ultimately as the development of embryos in the womb was better understood recapitulation theory was superseded. Still it left its mark on science, even influencing cognitive research and music theory. Develop your understanding of embryology and listen to this week’s episode of Good in Theory!

  4. 13

    Vortex theory of atoms: Knot great

    What is the difference between hydrogen and helium? Before the internal structure of atoms was known atoms were thought to be like tiny pool balls. This can explain different sizes and masses, but fails to explain the difference in chemical properties. That’s when the vortex theory of atoms emerged. Atoms were believed to be vortexes in an aether that permeated everything. This theory went beyond established mathematics, so that its proponents had to develop hydrodynamics and establish a new field called knot theory. The full theory seemed to always be just out of reach, but surely with a bit more development of the mathematical foundations all open questions would be answered. In the end the downfall of aether theory took the vortex theory of the atom down with it. Do knot miss out on this week’s episode of Good in Theory!

  5. 12

    Energeticism: Everything is energy

    After the great success of thermodynamics some scientists started to doubt that mechanics,the theory describing the movement of matter, was fit to describe the underlying nature ofreality. They believed that thermodynamics teaches us that energy is more fundamental thanmatter, leading them to the theory of energeticism. Not only was this theory met withscepticism, its proponents were pretty much attacked by scientists backing the moreaccepted theory of atoms. Everyone loves an underdog, but unfortunately this story endswith the destruction of energeticism when atoms were experimentally discovered. If you wantsome good energy, listen to this week’s podcast of Good in Theory.

  6. 11

    Out of Asia: Where did we come from?

    Where did humanity as a species come from? By the end of the 19th century scientists had accepted Darwin’s theory of evolution. So what does this mean for humanity? Nowadays humans live (almost) all over the world, but where did the first humans live? Given that we all belong to one species scientists thought that we can’t have evolved independently everywhere, but that there was an original cradle of humanity and later humans embarked on their quest to populate (almost) all continents. The first evidence for early humans was found in south-east Asia. Bias and false ideas of how early humans should have looked like led to a long period of time in which people believed humanity stems out of Asia. But in the end scientists found evidence of earlier humans in Africa. Dig into the history of humanity by listening to this week’s episode of Good in Theory.

  7. 10

    Balance of nature: As it should be

    How come predators never hunt their prey to extinction? Is this balance of species in an ecosystem a natural law or more of a superstition? Already the ancient Greeks seemed to have believed in a balance of nature and nowadays this terminology is still sometimes used. But what exactly is this balance and can it be defined in a scientific way? This question was raised in the 18th century when the discovery of fossils of unknown species radically changed our view on ecology. While some scientists still tried to make sense of it, today the world “balance” is no longer seen as useful when describing ecosystems. For a good balance of entertainment and information listen to this week’s episode of Good in Theory.

  8. 9

    Caloric Theory: That’s hot

    Why does your tea get cold if you leave it standing around for too long? Because the temperature of the tea adjusts to the temperature of the room, but why? The process of transferring heat puzzled many scientists. In the late 18th century caloric theory emerged in which the temperature of a body depends on the amount of “caloric” it possesses. Caloric was thought to be a weightless fluid which flows from hotter to colder bodies. The theory succeeded in explaining phenomena like your tea going cold. Although the theory managed to capture some key properties of heat it had several shortcomings and ultimately didn’t stand the test of time. If you are burning to learn more, listen to this week’s episode of Good in Theory.

  9. 8

    Preformation: Babies all the way down

    How are living things created? Was there some major event of creation where all generations to come were nested inside their ancestors? Or is the creation of life a process starting when paternal and maternal fluids come together? Before the discovery of cells and atoms, some scientists believed things were infinitely divisible. This led them to the theory that even before a pregnancy there is a small human inside its parent that in turn has all possible children it will have inside itself and so on. This infinite tower of mini humans was thought to avoid the problem of how things that are not alive can create a living being. In the end this theory of preformationism in embryology found its downfall. Listen to the whole story this week on the Good in Theory podcast.

  10. 7

    Expanding Earth: Moving continents and science

    To explain why some continents that are now oceans apart seem to have once fit together, scientists hypothesized that the Earth itself must be dynamic. More precisely they thought it was expanding over time, slowly inflating like a balloon, pushing continents apart and creating oceans in between. This theory was momentarily popular but cracks soon started showing. Why was it expanding? Was it getting heavier too? Did it affect gravity? And if this was really how planets worked, why wasn’t Mars or Venus doing the same thing? Expand your minds by listening to this week’s episode of Good in Theory.

  11. 6

    Phlogiston: Burning down alchemy

    The bridge between alchemy and chemistry was crossed when scientists tried to answer the question: “Why do things burn?”. Starting from the perspective of four elements and arriving at the discovery of oxygen, this 100 year journey is a brilliant showcase of the difference between pseudoscience and science. Why do some materials burn and others don’t? How can we explain why things cease burning? To answer these questions scientists assumed that there was a material substance that left the material while burning. To learn about how this substance could help explain combustion and what hydrogen has to do with it, listen to this week’s episode of Good in Theory.

  12. 5

    Four Humours: Fluids everywhere

    Four seasons, four elements, four directions... four humours. In ancient Greece it seemed clear that just as our world was built from four elements, our bodies must be regulated by four vital fluids. When these humours fell out of balance, disease and bad moods followed. For centuries doctors practiced medicine based on this idea: identify which fluid is winning and remove some of it until the patient stops complaining. It wasn’t until the 20th century that a discovery truly revolutionised medicine and finally laid this theory to rest. Cure your curiosity and listen to this week’s episode of Good in Theory.

  13. 4

    Lamarck Evolution: How much do your choices matter?

    How do animals adjust to changing environments? Why are some living things much more complex than others? Before Darwin came up with his theory of evolution, Jean-Baptiste Lamarck had a theory of evolution of his own. Instead of using language such as “mutation” and “natural selection”, his theory is one of gradual and intentional change. “Extinction” was also not in his vocabulary, instead he talked about “spontaneous generation” and “complexifying force”. To evolve your understanding of Lamarck's theory of evolution and how it was used culturally and politically, listen to this week’s episode of Good in Theory.

  14. 3

    Miasma: What's that smell?

    Clear skies, fresh air, that must mean there are no diseases here? For millennia people believed that the spread of diseases was connected to the quality of the air. If the air was cold, polluted and smelt rotten you were sure to get infected with cholera or the black plague if you were out too long. Miasma theory had an enormous impact on people's habits and even the economy of southern China. It was only in the 19th century that this medical belief was seriously challenged, which led to more effective ways of dealing with pandemics and the prevention of many deaths. For tips on hygiene and disease control listen to this week’s episode of Good in Theory.

  15. 2

    Aether: speaking of nothing

    Water waves are movements in water, so light waves are movements in… aether. At least that was the leading theory in the 18th century. Sounds simple enough but nailing down what this aether is leads to curious properties. In truth light waves are quite different from water waves in many respects including that their speed is constant no matter how fast you yourself are going. The history of aether theory is tied to the emergence of both quantum theory and relativity. It records how scientists struggled to let go of their intuition and see the reality of space and time in a new light. Join us on our mission to understand the true nature of light and listen to this week’s episode of Good in Theory.

  16. 1

    Vulcan: Trust me bro, it exists

    Naming the planet closest to the sun after the roman god of fire seems appropriate. The problem: it doesn’t exist. When confronted with data of planetary movements that do not fit your calculations you have two options: your theory is wrong or there is some big object influencing the planetary motion that you did not take into account. Since the latter turned out to be the case once before - and led to the discovery of Neptune - you might want to go that route again. At least that was what Urbain Le Verrier did. To hear more about the search for the mysterious planet of Vulcan and what Einstein has to do with all this, listen to this week's episode of Good in Theory. Created and produced by: Rita Neves and Sofie RiedIntro/outro music: Andrew Glover

Type above to search every episode's transcript for a word or phrase. Matches are scoped to this podcast.

Searching…

We're indexing this podcast's transcripts for the first time — this can take a minute or two. We'll show results as soon as they're ready.

No matches for "" in this podcast's transcripts.

Showing of matches

No topics indexed yet for this podcast.

Loading reviews...

ABOUT THIS SHOW

Good in Theory is a podcast about brilliant scientific theories—that just happened not to be true. Join Rita and Sofie as they dive headfirst into disproven theories across biology, chemistry, physics, and medicine. They'll unpack what made the ideas so compelling, where they spectacularly failed, and how they still managed to leave a fascinating mark on science and culture. Have a listen if you want to learn about wacky, wrong, and weirdly impactful science history alongside two enthusiastic guides!

HOSTED BY

Good in Theory Team

CATEGORIES

URL copied to clipboard!