Hung

In the final episode of the Meggan Sundwall case, Maryn takes the lead as the verdict comes in — and the reaction is anything but quiet. She and Christie unpack the public response, the social media debate, and the evidence that never made it to trial. Then sentencing arrives, and Meggan speaks. Five episodes in, and this case still isn’t simple. Will this case be… Hung?

In Part 4 of the Meggan Sundwall case, Christie walks us through the defense’s last stand — a forensic psychologist dissecting Kacee’s psychology and Meggan’s motivations, and a former FBI agent taking direct aim at the investigation. Followed by closing arguments. Then Christie delivers her verdict. Four episodes in, and it all comes down to this: was it murder?

In Part 3 of the Meggan Sundwall case, Christie walks us through the defense’s strategy — reframing Kacee’s lies, fraud, and drug activity as evidence of suicide while questioning Meggan’s role in her death. The state counters with forensic experts, testimony from Kacee’s ex-husband, and an endocrinologist whose findings raise serious questions. Christie and Maryn weigh the evidence as the state rests and the defense prepares its final push.

In Part 2 of the Meggan Sundwall case, Christie digs into the digital evidence — and it’s damning. A forensic analysis of Meggan’s phone reveals a trail of searches, deletions, and a years-long text thread with Kacee that prosecutors say tells the whole story. This one’s a mega episode — because trust us, you’ll want every detail. Christie and Maryn wade through the messages and ask the question the jury will have to answer: was this a mercy — or a murder?

In Part 1 of the Meggan Sundwall case, Christie walks us through the trial of a Utah nurse charged with aggravated murder in the death of her friend Kacee Lynn Terry. The state alleges Meggan helped administer a fatal insulin overdose — all while expecting to collect a $1.5 million life insurance policy. The defense says the state can’t prove it wasn’t suicide. Christie and Maryn dig into the testimony, the texts, and a web of lies that goes deeper than anyone expected.

In the final installment of the Issiah Ross case, Maryn takes the lead as the verdict finally arrives — after four days of deliberations stretched out by a winter storm. She and Christie break down the evidence the jury leaned on, Ross’s background, his controversial post-incident SoundCloud uploads, and his mother’s Facebook Live reactions. They also discuss “Lyric and Devin’s Law,” new legislation prompted by the case. Was justice served? Maryn and Christie weigh in.

In Part 2 of the Issiah Ross case, Christie digs into the trial evidence — and the deeper she goes, the murkier the picture gets. Two sides. Two stories. And enough conflicting evidence to make anyone second-guess themselves. Will Maryn and Christie come out with a verdict? Or will this case be… Hung?

In January 2026, Issiah Ross stood trial for the September 2022 killings of 18-year-old Devin Clark and 14-year-old Lyric Woods — two teenagers found dead on a secluded service road in Mebane, North Carolina. The state says Ross lured them there under the guise of a sexual encounter, then shot them both and fled to Delaware. The defense tells a different story: that Devin shot Lyric first, turned the gun on Ross, and Ross fired back in self-defense. This week, Christie takes the lead as she walks us through the trial, and she and Maryn dig into the evidence to figure out what really happened that night.

Maryn and Christie break down the Tracey Nix case, starting with the unusual six-person jury and how that can shape deliberations. They walk through the trial, the verdict, and the judge’s reasoning at sentencing. The hosts also explore information the jury never heard—details that raise new questions about how the case might have been viewed if they had been allowed in court. The episode ends with a surprising development after the trial, including allegations that led to Nix being moved within the prison system.

Maryn and Christie break down the Florida trial of Tracey Nix. Tracey was charged with aggravated manslaughter after her seven-month-old granddaughter, Uriel Shock, died after being left in a car for nearly three hours. The episode examines agreed-upon facts, witness testimony, bodycam footage, and medical evidence, alongside the defense’s claim of tragic negligence versus the prosecution’s argument of culpable disregard. At the center of the case: Florida’s legal definition of culpable negligence—and how it shapes the verdict.

In the final episode of the Colin Griffith series, Maryn and Christie move from the courtroom to the court of public opinion, examining why many continue to believe he is guilty despite a not guilty verdict. The episode revisits Colin’s background, family instability, and domestic violence history, and explores the 2023 Oklahoma shooting death he reported as self-defense — a case investigators declined to pursue after stating they could not rule it out. The hosts also discuss what evidence was excluded at trial, how outside information could have shaped juror perception, and the difficult line between legal innocence and factual certainty. Maryn reads from an Oklahoma arrest-warrant affidavit describing alleged inconsistencies at the scene, raising questions about whether charges could ever be revisited.

In Part 3 of the Collin Griffith series, Maryn and Christie break down major courtroom testimony, starting with Collin’s grandfather, who claims Collin confided violent thoughts about killing Cathy and Susan—claims the defense challenges with phone records, shifting timelines, and questions about credibility. The hosts then analyze Ring audio and texts from the day Cathy died, highlighting her escalating, manipulative threats to family members. The episode covers the single defense witness, Susan Dethman (Collin’s grandmother), and Susan’s testimony about family dysfunction. Finally, they discuss closing arguments—describing the prosecutor’s emotional, graphic approach and the defense’s measured focus on reasonable doubt and potential self-defense—Find out Christie's verdict as the trial draws to a close.

In Part 2 of our coverage of Florida v. Colin Griffith, Maryn and Christie continue their deep dive into the Collin Griffith case, emphasizing law enforcement interactions, forensic testimonies, and significant court scenes. This episode analyzes testimony from a juvenile detective, CSI technicians, and the medical examiner, detailing the crime scene, Cathy Griffith’s injuries, and the physical evidence collected. The hosts also explore Colin Griffith’s background, including prior domestic violence incidents and his interactions with mental health facilities, providing deeper context as the trial narrative develops.

In Part 1 of our coverage of Florida v. Colin Griffith, Maryn and Christie begin unpacking the case against Colin Griffith, who stands accused of the first-degree murder of his mother, Cathy Griffith, in September 2024. With a trial that moved quickly into early 2025, this first installment focuses on the opening courtroom testimony from forensic investigators, neighbors, and first responders as the initial details of the crime scene come into view. The hosts also examine Colin’s 9-1-1 call and the early actions of deputies and EMS, raising questions that will shape the case moving forward. Part 1 sets the stage for a deeper dive into the evidence and legal arguments still to come.

Join Maryn and Christie for the final episode of the infamous Casey Anthony case. Covering everything from Casey's background, her history of deceit, and controversial court proceedings to the differing public opinions and shocking new details, the hosts leave no stone unturned. The episode also explores the jury's perspective, less discussed facets of the investigation, and why Casey was ultimately acquitted despite the plethora of incriminating evidence. Perfect for true crime enthusiasts, this episode offers a comprehensive breakdown of one of the most sensational cases of the 21st century.

In Part 3 of our Florida v. Casey Anthony series, Maryn and Christie turn their focus to the defense’s case and courtroom strategy. This episode examines key defense testimony, including forensic entomologist, Dr. Huntington, and the evidence he presented to introduce reasonable doubt. The hosts also analyze testimony from Cindy and George Anthony, private investigators, grief specialists, and forensic experts, as well as the controversial role of Roy Kronk, the meter reader who discovered Caylee Anthony’s remains. Together, these elements reveal how the defense sought to challenge the prosecution’s narrative and ultimately influence the jury’s final verdict.

In this second installment in the Casey Anthony series, Maryn and Christie delve into the prosecution's case against Casey Anthony. They provide a detailed recap of the police investigation following the discovery of Caylee Anthony's remains. Discussions include expert testimonies on hair analysis, air samples, and forensic evidence collected from the crime scene and Casey's car. This episode offers insights into the evidence that shaped the prosecution's arguments and lays the groundwork for the defense's counterarguments in the next episode.

In Part 1 of our Casey Anthony series, Christie and Maryn begin unpacking one of the most divisive trials in recent history. Listen as we discuss Casey Anthony’s erratic behavior, her tangled web of lies, and testimony from key witnesses in the 2008 death of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee. This first installment covers the opening statements and the prosecution’s case, laying the groundwork for the trial — Stay tuned for part 2, which dives into the police investigation and expert testimony that followed.

In the debut episode of 'Hung,' hosts Maryn and Christie discuss their inspiration for starting the podcast. Join them weekly for a unique take on true crime that bridges the gap between the court of law and public opinion.