Legal Listening: The Fox Rothschild LLP Podcast

Episode 84 From Enron to Today: What 20 Years Taught Us About White Collar Crime Host Matt Adams sits down with former Enron Task Force lead prosecutor and Duke Law Professor Samuel Buell to trace the arc of corporate fraud enforcement — from the historic conviction of Enron's top executives to the challenges facing regulators and prosecutors today. Buell offers a candid look at how the Enron prosecution came together, including the pivotal decision to flip CFO Andrew Fastow, the controversial case against Arthur Andersen, and why holding individuals accountable in America's boardrooms remains far more difficult than the public tends to assume. Buell makes the case that criminal prosecution alone cannot prevent the next corporate crisis — and that strong regulatory infrastructure may matter more than any single perp walk. With the Department of Justice closing over 23,000 cases, the SEC losing experienced staff, and career prosecutors stepping away, Buell reflects on what happens when enforcement capacity erodes. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the participants and should not be considered the views of Fox Rothschild LLP or its attorneys. This podcast is for informational purposes only, is not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Episode 17 The Difference Between Labor Law and Employment Law Hosted by Mark G. Eskenazi and Katherine Cohodes We explore the difference between labor law and employment law. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the participants and should not be considered the views of Fox Rothschild LLP or its attorneys. This podcast is for informational purposes only, is not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Episode 83 Section 230 at 30: Can the Law That Built the Internet Survive? For 30 years, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act gave online platforms broad immunity from liability for user-generated content. But that shield is now full of holes and cracking in every direction. In this episode, host Matt Adams and Eric Goldman, Associate Dean for Research at Santa Clara University School of Law and a leading internet law scholar, break down Section 230's core doctrine, its statutory carve-outs and the creative legal theories plaintiffs are using to get around it. They examine why federal prosecutors can pursue criminal cases against platforms, while state attorneys general have been sidelined, even as they push for reform. They also explore Section 230’s applicability to generative AI and whether the Supreme Court might ultimately weigh in on the statute. You won’t want to miss this thought-provoking conversation, including a discussion on whether we've already passed the peak of free speech online and if Section 230 reform is just the canary in the coal mine. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the participants and should not be considered the views of Fox Rothschild LLP or its attorneys. This podcast is for informational purposes only, is not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship.