Necessary and Proper

Uploaded late but thats okay because the decisions we're talking about in this episode are just as relevant as they were 3 weeks ago. We talk a bit about the debate, about the two gun decisions that came out in June, as well as some of the social media case stuff.

May opinions and Alito flag controversy.

Another absurd abortion case. Idaho v. United States.

On January 6th 2021, Joe Fischer attended the Stop the Steal rally. He sent a couple of grammatically incorrect yet dramatic texts to his friends and followed the rest of the insurrectionists in after the doors of the capitol building had been stormed. The question in his case, which can impact the sentencing and prosecutions of over 300 individuals (including Trump) is whether his actions violate the 2002 1512 Obstruction clause.

FDA v. Alliance for Hyppocratic Medicine (about the mifepristone abortion pill) and Murthy v. Missouri (Biden's White House sending mean emails to online platform admins to control certain posts)

After a long hiatus and a couple of scrapped episodes we're back on schedule. In this episode we discuss Ohio v. EPA and Garland v. Cargill

We made it to 10!!! In this episode we're all over the place, catching up on recent Supreme Court news (including the December NYT Roe v. Wade leak expose), as well as giving an overview of some of the January cases. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/15/us/supreme-court-dobbs-roe-abortion.htmlhttps://www.politico.com/news/2023/12/18/clarence-thomas-supreme-court-propublica-00132252#:~:text=Supreme%20Court%20Justice%20Clarence%20Thomas%20complained%20about%20his%20salary%20to,a%20ProPublica%20report%20published%20Monday.

In this episode, we talk about SEC v. Jarkesy, an important case heard in December 2023. Through this case, we try to figure out what the SEC even does and if some of the things it does are or aren't constitutional.

Drugs may be winning the war on drugs but who is winning the war against the Purdue Pharma and the Sackler family? In this episode, Grace and Isabella discuss Harrington v. Purdue Pharma, heard in December 2023

In this episode, Grace tries to explain Moore v U.S, an important tax case heard in December

In this episode, Grace and Isabella talk about Brown v US, which concerns the Armed. Career Criminal Act, and McElrath v Georgia, which concerns the double jeopardy clause and confounding jury decisions

Re-uploaded for sound quality! In this episode we discuss U.S v. Rahimi

*Re-uploaded for sound quality!In this episode We the Ladies discuss the two big social media cases that were heard during the November sitting: Linke v. Freed and O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier

*Re-uploaded for sound quality!In this episode We the Ladies discuss Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP.

*Reuploaded for sound quality! In this episode we discuss Pulsifer v. U.S., Acheson Hotels LLC v Laufer, and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America