04 P.1: Top Trademark Developments! SpicyIP Annual Review 2025

2025 was quite an eventful year, marked by novel developments across different areas of intellectual property law. Here is SpicyIP's Annual Review of 2025 with developments curated across different categories: https://spicyip.com/2025/12/a-look-back-at-indias-top-ip-developments-of-2025.html. You can check out this blogpost for all the reading materials linked to it. We present to you an Annual Review Video in three parts that draw from the main blogpost. These are divided based on three subject areas: Trademarks, Patents, and Copyright and Other IPs.In this episode 04 (Part 1 of 3), the SpicyIP team reflects upon the most significant Trademarks Developments of 2025, organised across three categories, with each speaker explaining why a particular development made it to our list:a) Top IP Judgments/Orders by Topicality and/or Impact: These decisions reflect those that we thought were important from a topical point of view and were covered by the media in some way owing to the importance of parties litigating or the issue being considered or for impact on industry and innovation/creativity ecosystem, etc.b) Top IP Judgments/Orders by Jurisprudential Rigour and/ or Legal Lucidity: These decisions reflect those that we thought showed a fair bit of jurisprudential rigour and/or legal lucidity.c) Other IP Developments: Important developments which do not fall under any of the above categories Developments covered01:25- PART 1: JUDGMENTS/ORDERS BY TOPICALITY AND/OR IMPACT01:34- More than 15 Personality Rights order passed in 202503:54- The three judgments in Lifestyles Equities CV v. Amazon Technologies Inc 05:56- Dabur India Limited v. Ashok Kumar And Ors08:32- Trademark for Floral Fragrance/Smell Reminiscent of Roses as Applied to Tyres by Sumitomo Rubber Industries 10:47- PART 2: JURISPRUDENTIAL RIGOUR AND/OR LEGAL LUCIDITY10:53- Paragon Polymer Products Private v. Sumar Chand Nahar 12:26- VIP Industries Ltd v. Carlton Shoes Ltd & Anr 15:24- Pernod Ricard India Private Limited v. Karanveer Singh Chhabra17:20- PART 3: OTHER DEVELOPMENTS17:24- Delhi High Court Upholds FSSAI’s ban on Using the Term “ORS” for Beverages that do not meet WHO Regulatory StandardsUpdates:03:37 The blogposts on some of the new personality rights orders are in the descriptionThe following are the updates on some of the developments over the last three months:1. Kartik Sharma, Issued in Public Interest: Your Name is Not a Copyrighted Work, https://spicyip.com/2026/03/issued-in-public-interest-your-name-is-not-a-copyrighted-work.html2. Krisha Tiya Sahay, Rest in IP: Posthumous Personality Rights in the Age of Deepfakes, https://spicyip.com/2026/03/rest-in-ip-posthumous-personality-rights-in-the-age-of-deepfakes.html3. Arjun Ishaan, A Course Correction? What Rangaraj and Kamal Haasan Get Right about Personality Rights, https://spicyip.com/2026/01/a-course-correction-what-rangaraj-and-kamal-haasan-get-right-about-personality-rights.htmlSpeakers from the SpicyIP Team:Praharsh Gour is the Editor and Researcher at SpicyIPTanishka Goswami is an Officer Trainee (Law) at Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd., and an Analyst & part of the Podcast Team at SpicyIPKartik Sharma is a final year law student at National Law School of India University, Bengaluru, and an Analyst at SpicyIPKartikeya Srivastava is a final-year law student in the LL.B. course at National Law School of India University, BengaluruSonisha Srinivasan is a final year law student at Christ University, and a part of the Podcast Team at SpicyIPCredits: Swaraj Paul Barooah: Producer, Director, Editor, Thumbnail Art Praharsh Gour: Host, Researcher, Speaker Sonisha Srinivasan: Editor, Speaker Tanishka Goswami, Kartik Sharma, Kartikeya Srivastava: Speakers