1013 Trump's Attack On Iran: Is It Even Legal?

28 Feb 2026The US and Israel launched multiple attacks against Iran, prompting retaliation across the region. The legality of the strikes is debated, with some arguing they are legal domestically but violate international law. The timing of the attacks is questioned, with speculation about political motivations and the potential impact on Trump’s presidency.The legality of the US airstrike in Iran is questioned, with comparisons drawn to similar situations in Venezuela and Iran. While Canada and Australia support the US’s stance against Iran’s nuclear programme, they have not explicitly condemned the airstrike as illegal. Concerns are raised about the potential for further escalation, including retaliatory attacks on US personnel and the possibility of regime change in Iran, which could lead to increased repression.The Iranian opposition’s ability to take control of the Iranian government and eliminate the nuclear infrastructure and Revolutionary Guard is questioned. The legality of the strike is confirmed, and the speaker, as an American patriot, would not have recommended it. The Trump base, while supportive of regime change, is not entirely happy with the military action, preferring a focus on domestic issues.A potential conflict with Iran is unlikely to escalate into a “forever war” due to logistical challenges and limited troop deployment. However, it could lead to a messy situation in Iran and potentially disrupt the Strait of Hormuz, impacting global oil prices. Putin benefits from the situation as it distracts the US from Ukraine, increases oil prices, and allows him to portray the US as an aggressor.The speaker discusses the potential consequences of the US’s actions in Iran, highlighting the risk of escalating conflict and the potential for a negative impact on the US’s reputation and international relations. They emphasise the importance of a peaceful resolution and a democratic transition in Iran, while acknowledging the uncertainty surrounding the situation and the potential for unforeseen consequences. The speaker also expresses concern about the potential for domestic unrest in the US if the situation escalates.