11. How a Free Society Controls Its Military – Peter Feaver

How does a free society maintain a powerful military without allowing it to dominate politics?In this episode of Tocqueville Talks, Director Brent Nelson and co-host Beth L’Arrivée speak with Peter Feaver (Duke University), one of the leading scholars of civil–military relations and former Director for Defense Policy and Arms Control on the U.S. National Security Council.Feaver’s work centers on a fundamental question: how can democratic societies maintain both military strength and civilian control?Drawing on his experience in both academia and national security policymaking, Feaver reflects on the mentors who shaped his career—including Joseph Nye—and the experiences that led him to study the delicate balance between military professionalism and democratic accountability.The conversation explores the American tradition of civilian control from George Washington to the present, why healthy civil–military relations often go unnoticed until they break down, and the growing pressures polarization places on the military today.They discuss:Why civilian control of the military is one of America’s most remarkable political achievementsHow political leaders sometimes draw the military into partisan conflicts Why the military often becomes a “vanguard” institution in social changeThe tension between democratic society and hierarchical military institutionsThe civic importance of the All-Volunteer ForceWhy veterans strengthen civic life and community leadershipThe value of ROTC programs on college campusesHow encounters between soldiers and students change how young Americans think about warThe role of literature, history, and civic education in helping society understand war and serviceFeaver argues that healthy civil–military relations are like oxygen: when they work, no one notices—but when they fail, nothing else matters.At a moment of polarization and declining trust in institutions, this conversation asks a crucial question:How can Americans preserve a professional military while strengthening democratic citizenship?