EPISODE · Feb 11, 2026 · 36 MIN
143 | Analyze Nutrition Studies Like a Scientist
from Exam Room Nutrition: Where Busy Clinicians Learn About Nutrition
Randomized controlled trials. Cohort studies. Abstracts. Methods sections.If your brain starts spinning just hearing those words, you’re not alone.In this episode, I’m joined by Dr. Carlene Starck, a protein biochemist and nutrition scientist, to help clinicians who aren’t researchers learn how to spot high-quality research in a world full of misinformation.Together, we walk through how a researcher evaluates a paper, what matters, what doesn’t, and why social media influencers often get the science wrong. We even unpack a real paper that went viral online to show how misleading conclusions can spread when studies are misquoted or misunderstood.In this episode, you’ll learn:A clear explanation and examples of the hierarchy of evidenceWhat information you can (and can’t) get from an abstractWhy the methods section matters (even though many of us skip it)How sample size, study design, and bias affect conclusionsA simple framework for quickly assessing whether a paper is high qualityHere's the article we analyzed: A prospective birth cohort study on cord blood folate subtypes and risk of autism spectrum disorder - PubMedConnect with Carlene on LinkedInStarck ScienceAny Questions? Send Me a MessageSupport the showConnect with Colleen:InstagramLinkedInSign up for my FREE Newsletter - Nutrition hot-topics delivered to your inbox each week.Disclaimer: This podcast is a collection of ideas, strategies, and opinions of the author(s). Its goal is to provide useful information on each of the topics shared within. It is not intended to provide medical, health, or professional consultation or to diagnosis-specific weight or feeding challenges. The author(s) advises the reader to always consult with appropriate health, medical, and professional consultants for support for individual children and family situations. The author(s) do not take responsibility for the personal or other risks, loss, or liability incurred as a direct or indirect consequence of the application or use of information provided. All opinions stated in this podcast are my own and do not reflect the opinions of my employer.
Embed this episode
What this episode covers
Randomized controlled trials. Cohort studies. Abstracts. Methods sections. If your brain starts spinning just hearing those words, you’re not alone. In this episode, I’m joined by Dr. Carlene Starck, a protein biochemist and nutrition scientist, to help clinicians who aren’t researchers learn how to spot high-quality research in a world full of misinformation. Together, we walk through how a researcher evaluates a paper, what matters, what doesn’t, and why social media influencers often get t...
NOW PLAYING
143 | Analyze Nutrition Studies Like a Scientist
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.