149. The Science/Advocacy Tension: PHAIR Animal Advocacy Conference 4/5 episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 30, 2026 · 21 MIN

149. The Science/Advocacy Tension: PHAIR Animal Advocacy Conference 4/5

from The Deal with Animals with Marika S. Bell

Episode 4 examines the tension and opportunity where animal-advocacy goals and research on the psychology of eating animals overlap, drawing on conversations from the PHAIR conference. Researchers and advocates discuss credibility, bias, conflicts of interest, and “epistemic pollution” in a climate of distrust, including how carnism can be treated as invisible ideology and how advocacy incentives may shape interpretation of findings. The episode also highlights a mismatch in urgency—advocates want rapid change while science moves slowly—and the need to make research accessible, relevant, and collaborative so it can be used off the page.This episode features:Joshua Rottman — Associate professor of psychology. Studies moral reasoning, human–animal relations, and how people reconcile beliefs about harm with everyday behaviour.Tobias Leenaert — Author and strategist focused on pragmatic, evidence‑based advocacy. Known for promoting incremental change, cultural sensitivity, and long‑term movement strategy.Brooke Haggerty — Executive Director of Faunalytics. Works at the intersection of research and advocacy, helping organisations use data to design more effective interventions and understand public attitudes toward animals.Jared Piazza — Senior lecturer in social psychology. Researches moral judgement, meat consumption, and the psychological mechanisms people use to justify animal use.Ondine Sherman — Author and co‑founder of Voiceless. Works on compassionate education, narrative change, and the emotional dimensions of advocacy.Sue O’Neill — Crisis‑support practitioner and applied researcher. Brings frontline insight into how people make decisions under pressure and how advocacy organisations can better support them.Matthew Ruby — Senior Lecturer in Psychology. Research explores moral cognition, food choices, and the psychology of eating animals, examining how cultural norms and identity shape dietary behaviour and openness to change.Chris Hopwood — Professor of psychology specialising in personality and interpersonal behaviour. Examines how people navigate moral conflict, identity, and the tensions between caring about animals and everyday habits.Related Links:PHAIR Society A biannual gathering of researchers and advocates focused on human–animal intergroup relations, moral psychology, and behaviour change.For more info check out the blog at www.thedealwithanimals.comGuest Book Recommendations List

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 30, 2026

Embed this episode

Ready to play

149. The Science/Advocacy Tension: PHAIR Animal Advocacy Conference 4/5

0:00 21:20

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of The Deal with Animals with Marika S. Bell?

This episode is 21 minutes long.

When was this The Deal with Animals with Marika S. Bell episode published?

This episode was published on July 30, 2026.

Can I download this The Deal with Animals with Marika S. Bell episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!