177. The Queenmaker
from Womanhood & International Relations Hosted by Natalia A. Bonilla Berrios
How free are Women in Politics? When does personal agency or identity can get lost in the launch and execution of political campaigns? What weighs more in the road to election: personal reasons, collective pressures/promises or a combination of both? With the rise of female candidates running for presidential positions in different countries, what's the ratio of commitment to serve the people vs. the interests of corporations, donors and campaign backers? Just as subjects can become political, what if staying too long in positions of political power strips elected officials from their own personal identity? Who are they or who they can be without... "Politics"? And is this possible crisis of personal identity a reason why they may "cling" to "power"? A review of the TV series The Queenmaker. Join the exploration, you can follow us on LinkedIn and Instagram @womanhood_ir Listen to related episodes: 61. Natalie Caraballo on Women's Political Participation in Puerto Rico 139. The Queen’s Gambit 142. Psychology in International Relations 155. Borgen: Power & Glory 164. The Diplomat Recommended links: The Queenmaker The Good, the Bad and the Different: Can Gender Quotas Raise the Quality of Politicians? Women Political Leaders: The Impact of Gender on Democracy Gender bias and women’s political performance Handbook on promoting women’s participation in political parties Women and Political Leadership Ahead of the US 2024 Election Quiénes son Claudia Sheinbaum y Xóchitl Gálvez, las dos aspirantes a convertirse en la primera presidenta de México
Embed this episode
No transcript yet.