*2.3-Makkos Daf 02 B (22 Lines Down)*

*2.3-Makkos Daf 02 B(22 Lines Down)**Summary**Ula:* Is there *a hint to the law of administering _malkos_* when standard ka’asher zamam is impossible?*The possuk states* (regarding two men who have a dispute in _beis din_ ): “Justify the righteous one, and condemn he who is wrong (the _rasha_ ), *then whip the man* who is wrong if applicable”.*Question:* Shouldn’t they get _malkos_ because they said *false testimony* , which is a _lav_ (Torah prohibition)?*Answer:* _Malkos_ does not apply to *a _lav_ which does not involve action* (it’s just words).*Beraisa:* Four exceptional laws of _eidim zoimemim:_1. They do not become *_kohanim chalalim_* (“ *He* ” is punished, not his children).2. They are not punished with *_galus_* (“ *He* ” has to flee, not _zoimemim_ ).3. They do not pay *_kofer_* (A penalty one pays when his animal kills a person).4. They are not sold into slavery (When a thief cannot repay what he stole the laws of *_eved ivri_* apply to him and he is sold as a “Hebrew Slave”).*Rabbi Akiva adds:* (5.) They do not pay *by their own admission.*(If they admit to _beis din_ that a different beis din found them guilty of _hazamah_ , they are not liable to pay the _hazamah_ penalty because it is a knas. [For a fuller explanation see _shiur_ 3.1]). See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information. This podcast has been graciously sponsored by JewishPodcasts.fm. There is much overhead to maintain this service so please help us continue our goal of helping Jewish lecturers become podcasters and support us with a donation: https://thechesedfund.com/jewishpodcasts/donate