*22.4 Makkos Daf 14 B (16 lines Up)*

*22.4 Makkos Daf 14 B (16 lines Up)*Today's learning sponsored by *Moshe Horowitz* In honor of *the hardworking author of the summaries*Sponsor a day's learning (thousands of minutes!) for only $50 *click here:*https://www.flipcause.com/secure/cause_pdetails/ODUwOTU=According to Reish Lakish, the _azhara_ for an individual who consumed _kodesh_ while in a state of _tumah_ is from “She must not touch kodesh [nor enter the _mikdash_ ]”.Rabbi Yochanan argued; “Kodesh” in that _possuk_ refers to _terumah._*Summary**Challenge:* Does Reish Lakish derive the _lav_ prohibiting eating kodesh from the _possuk_ “She must not touch _kodesh_ ”? Doesn’t he learn the _lav_ prohibiting a _tamei_ from *touching _kodesh_* from here?*We Learned: If a _tamei_ touched _kodesh_**Reish Lakish:* He is liable for *_malkos._**Rabbi Yochanan:* There is *no _malkos_* penalty.*Reish Lakish:* He is liable for _malkos,_ as the verse states; *“She must not touch _kodesh”._**Rabbi Yochanan:* There is no malkos penalty; that _possuk_ refers to _terumah._*Resolution:* The wording of the verse *explicitly mentions touching,* so that is our _azhara._However, *the _possuk_ continues with the law prohibiting entry* to the _mikdash_ which implies an act of _kareis._Touching _kodesh_ is not known to be an act of _kareis,_ only eating _kodesh,_ so *the _hekesh_ teaches us the _lav_ prohibiting eating _kodesh._* See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information. This podcast has been graciously sponsored by JewishPodcasts.fm. There is much overhead to maintain this service so please help us continue our goal of helping Jewish lecturers become podcasters and support us with a donation: https://thechesedfund.com/jewishpodcasts/donate