*22.6 Makkos Daf 14 B (6 lines Up)*

*22.6 Makkos Daf 14 B (6 lines Up)**Today’s learning sponsored as a zechus for the speedy recovery of Rochel bas Reizel*Sponsor a day's learning (thousands of minutes!) for only $50 *click here:*https://www.flipcause.com/secure/cause_pdetails/ODUwOTUAccording to Reish Lakish, the _azhara_ for an individual who consumed _kodesh_ while in a state of _tumah_ is from “She must not touch _kodesh_ [nor enter the _mikdash_ ]”.Rabbi Yochanan derived it from a _gezeirah shaveh_ .*Summary*There is a Beraisa that *supports the opinion of Reish Lakish.**Beraisa:* “She must not touch any _kodesh_ ”. *This is an _azhara_ forbidding a tamei from eating _kodesh_ .**Perhaps it prohibits touching?*The possuk says “She must not touch _kodesh_ nor enter the _mikdash”._ *Entry to the _mikdash_ is a capital crime.*Since touching _kodesh_ is not known to be a capital crime, only eating _kodesh,_ we understand that *the _possuk_ refers to eating _kodesh_ .* (22.4)_[Some Torah prohibitions are categorized as a lav hanitak l’eseh; a lav that gets moved over, and becomes an eseh (5.3). For instance “do not leave over from kodesh meat”, “any meat that is left over should be burned”. By means of the added eseh, the Torah is telling us how to remedy transgression of the lav, and such a lav is not liable for malkos.]_*Rabbah bar bar Chanah amar Rabbi Yochanan: An eseh that precedes the lav*¤, does not make it a _lav hanitak l’eseh,_ and *carries a _malkos_ penalty.*¤It is written earlier in the possuk. This follows the explanation of *Ritva* (23.1). For *Rashi’s explanation,* see separate audio. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information. This podcast has been graciously sponsored by JewishPodcasts.fm. There is much overhead to maintain this service so please help us continue our goal of helping Jewish lecturers become podcasters and support us with a donation: https://thechesedfund.com/jewishpodcasts/donate