*23.1 Makkos Daf 14 B (2 lines Up)*

*23.1 Makkos Daf 14 B (2 lines Up)*Today’s learning sponsored as a zechus for the speedy recovery of *Rochel bas Reizel*Sponsor a day's learning (thousands of minutes!) for only $50 *click here:* https://www.flipcause.com/secure/cause_pdetails/ODUwOTU=*Summary*_[Some Torah prohibitions are categorized as a lav hanitak l’eseh; a lav that gets moved over, and becomes an eseh (5.3). For instance “do not leave over from kodesh meat”, “any meat that is left over should be burned”. By means of the added eseh, the Torah is telling us how to remedy transgression of the lav, and such a lav is not liable for malkos.]_*Rabbah bar bar Chanah amar Rabbi Yochanan: An _eseh_ that precedes the _lav_* _[There are two ways of understanding this. 1. It is written earlier in the possuk. 2. The eseh is doable before the lav was transgressed],_ does not make it a _lav hanitak l’eseh,_ and it *carries a malkos penalty.*They said *to Rabbi Yochanan:* Did you say so? And *he denied it.* _[Although those asking him may have heard it from his mouth, since he had fully retracted his opinion, he denied his first conclusion. This was to indicate that he retracted fully and believed his first opinion to have been a complete error]._*Rabbah: I swear he said so.* And it was founded on the words of the Mishna.*It is written:* _“Temei’im_ are to be sent away from the camp” ( _eseh_ ) “And they may not contaminate the camp [by entering in a state of _tumah]” (lav)._*We learned in the Mishna* (20.2) [among those who receive _malkos_ ] “One who entered the _mikdash_ in a state of _tumah_ ”. Evidently, *_malkos_ is applicable to a _lav_ preceded by an _eseh._* See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information. This podcast has been graciously sponsored by JewishPodcasts.fm. There is much overhead to maintain this service so please help us continue our goal of helping Jewish lecturers become podcasters and support us with a donation: https://thechesedfund.com/jewishpodcasts/donate