[24-354] Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research episode artwork

EPISODE · Mar 26, 2025 · 2H 33M

[24-354] Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research

from Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Mar 26, 2025. Petitioner: Federal Communications Commission, et al.Respondent: Consumers' Research, et al. Advocates: Sarah M. Harris (for the Petitioners in No. 24-354) Paul D. Clement (for the Petitioners in No. 24-422) R. Trent McCotter (for the Respondents) Facts of the case (from oyez.org) The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was established in 1934 to regulate interstate communications and ensure widespread access to telecommunications services. To further this mission, Congress in 1996 instructed the FCC to establish and maintain a universal service fund, requiring telecommunications carriers to contribute quarterly based on their revenues. The FCC partners with the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC), a private entity, to manage this process—USAC calculates projected demand and contribution factors using FCC formulas, submits these proposals to the FCC for approval, and then uses the approved figures to determine individual contribution amounts. Consumers’ Research challenged the constitutionality of the 1996 Telecommunications Act’s universal service requirements and the FCC’s implementation of those requirements. Their primary arguments were twofold: first, that Congress unconstitutionally delegated its legislative power to the FCC through the universal service provisions, and second, that the FCC improperly delegated its authority to a private entity (USAC) to manage the universal service fund. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied the petition, finding no constitutional violations in either delegation. The Court determined that Congress provided sufficient guidance (an “intelligible principle”) to the FCC in the statute, and that the FCC maintained adequate control and oversight over USAC’s activities in managing the universal service fund, preventing any improper delegation of government authority to a private entity. Question Did Congress violate the Constitution in the way it delegated power to the FCC to collect Universal Service Fund money, and did the FCC violate the Constitution by letting a private, industry-controlled company make those collection decisions?

NOW PLAYING

[24-354] Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research

0:00 2:33:18

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

The Laura Ingraham Show Laura Ingraham The most-watched woman in the history of cable news brings her no-holds-barred political and cultural commentary to podcasting with The Laura Ingraham Show. A bestselling author, breast cancer survivor, and mother of three internationally adopted children, Laura was the most listened-to woman in talk radio before launching her own podcast. A trailblazer across media platforms, she brings a unique perspective to this twice-weekly show, drawing on her experience as a white-collar criminal defense litigator and a Supreme Court law clerk.New episodes drop twice a week—delivering the clarity, courage, and common sense America needs. Across The Pond Liberty Stacia Whittecar and Kirstin Clark Welcome to "Across the Pond Liberty," the podcast that paints the New York Liberty's journey in vibrant colours, uniting fans from both sides of the Atlantic. Join hosts Stacia from Kansas and Kirstin from Scotland, as they embark on an exhilarating season-long journey with the Liberty, delivering the latest news, updates, and a shared passion for the team. Meet Your Hosts: 🏀 Stacia: Hailing from Kansas, Stacia's love for the New York Liberty transcends geographical boundaries. With her deep understanding of the game and unwavering support for the team, Stacia is your guide to all things Liberty, both on and off the court. 🏀 Kirstin: Crossing the ocean from Scotland, Kirstin adds an international touch to the podcast. Her genuine passion for the Liberty and her unique perspective from across the pond contribute a fresh outlook that connects fans worldwide. Diving into the Liberty's World: "Across the Pond Liberty" is you Fieldhouse Files: Scott Agness on the Indiana Pacers Scott Agness Fieldhouse Files is a Pacers podcast from reporter Scott Agness, who's been around The Fieldhouse since 2003. He delivers comprehensive coverage of the team, tracking how the Pacers are performing on the court as well as going deep into stories about the team off the court. Foul Play: A Historical True Crime Podcast Shane L. Waters, Wendy Cee, Gemma Hoskins Foggy gaslit streets. A quiet courtroom. And crimes that history tried to bury.Foul Play is a historical true crime podcast that investigates the most chilling murder cases from the 1800s and early 1900s across the United States and the United Kingdom. Hosted by investigative crime journalists Shane Waters — who pioneered crime podcasting in 2008 — and Wendy Cee, each season unravels one complete criminal case through original research, court records, and primary source material.This isn't sensationalized true crime. Every season of Foul Play puts victims first — their names, their stories, their humanity — before examining how murder investigations unfolded in an era before modern forensics, when justice was far from guaranteed.From Victorian poisoners in London to Gilded Age killers in America, Foul Play brings historical true crime to life with cinematic storytelling and relentless accuracy. Every fact is verified. Every claim is sourced. Every story is told with the gravity it d

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Supreme Court Oral Arguments?

This episode is 2 hours and 33 minutes long.

When was this Supreme Court Oral Arguments episode published?

This episode was published on March 26, 2025.

What is this episode about?

Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Mar 26, 2025. Petitioner: Federal Communications Commission, et al.Respondent: Consumers' Research, et al. Advocates: Sarah M. Harris (for...

Can I download this Supreme Court Oral Arguments episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!