*25.2 Makkos Daf 16 A (Bottom line)*

*25.2 Makkos Daf 16 A (Bottom line)*Today’s learning sponsoredSponsor a day's learning (thousands of minutes!) for only $50 *click here:*https://www.flipcause.com/secure/cause_pdetails/ODUwOTURabbi Yochanan: Shiluach Hakan is one of only two _lav hanitak l’esehs_ that have the possibility of carrying a _malkos_ penalty.Rabbi Elazar, the other one is Oneis.Challenge: Are there no more than two _lav hanitak l’esehs_ that have the possibility of carrying a malkos penalty? What about a case of a _mashkon_ ? The Torah states “Do not enter his house to collect a collateral” and “You should return it”.Resolution: Since this is a case of monetary obligation, he does not receive _malkos._*Summary**Challenge:* What about *the collateral of a _ger_ ?* [When a _ger_ passes away without children there are no heirs, and he had destroyed the collateral and can no longer pay it back].*Resolution: He has not ruined his opportunity of fulfilling the _eseh,_* it was ruined by the ger’s death _[destroying the collateral has no bearing on fulfilling the eseh. It is only the ger’s death which ruins the opportunity to fulfill the eseh, and the death was not caused by the debtor]._*Challenge: What about Pei’ah?* The Torah states “Do not cut everything down” and “You shall leave over for the poor and needy”.This carries a _malkos_ liability *even if we hold _bitlo v’lo bitlo,_* as we’ve learned in a _mishna:_It is a _mitzvah_ to separate _pei’ah_ from the standing grain. If he didn’t, he must separate from the sheaves. This podcast has been graciously sponsored by JewishPodcasts.fm. There is much overhead to maintain this service so please help us continue our goal of helping Jewish lecturers become podcasters and support us with a donation: https://thechesedfund.com/jewishpodcasts/donate