*27.3 Makkos Daf 17 B (4 lines Up)*

*27.3 Makkos Daf 17 B (4 lines Up)**Today’s learning sponsored*In honor of *Rav Shaul Yechezkel Schwartz Shlita* for his selfless dedication to the klalSponsor a day's learning (thousands of minutes!) for only $50 *click here:*https://www.flipcause.com/secure/cause_pdetails/ODUwOTURabbi Shimon derived certain lavin from a _possuk_ based on logical arguments. Since _lavin_ cannot be established by logic, we understand that he derived ‘prohibitions’ not actual _‘lavin’._*Summary**Challenge: Rabbi Shimon is referring to a _lav._**Rava:* If a non-kohen ate from an olah before _zerikah,_ outside of Yerushalayim, he would be liable for *five sets of _malkos_ according to Rabbi Shimon* [For all the _lavin_ previously derived by Rabbi Shimon; 1, Eating outside Yerushalayim, 2, eating outside the _azarah,_ 3, eating an _olah,_ 4, by a non-kohen, 5, before _zerikah]._*Resolution:* Rava does not mean five _lavin,_ *he actually means five prohibitions.**Challenge:* The mishna states *“These are liable for _malkos”_* [and two of Rabbi Shimon’s _lavin_ are mentioned, it seems they’re bona fide _lavin]._*Resolution:* The _lavin_ are not derived by logic but by the *superfluity of the verse.*Earlier in Devarim 12, all of these admonishments are detailed; in our _possuk_ they’re repeated as prohibitions. But the _possuk_ could have said “You may not eat them in your gates”. *From the _possuk’s_ repetition of all the details we learn a _lav_ on each detail.* See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information. This podcast has been graciously sponsored by JewishPodcasts.fm. There is much overhead to maintain this service so please help us continue our goal of helping Jewish lecturers become podcasters and support us with a donation: https://thechesedfund.com/jewishpodcasts/donate