*28.5 Makkos Daf 19 A (Middle)*

*28.5 Makkos Daf 19 A (Middle)*Rav Sheishes said that only Placing is required in order to permit Bikkurim. A source for this was found in a _beraisa_ forbidding the consumption of _maaser sheini_ in Yerushalayim after the _churban._ It could not deduced logically from Bechor (which is a _korban_ ), nor from Bikkurim (which requires Placing); it was deduced from a _hekesh_ in a _possuk._ Since the beraisa only mentions that Bikkurim requires Placing and not Reading, it seems that only Placing is required.*Summary**Rav Ashi:* Even according to the opinion that Reading is not “required”, *it is certainly part of the Bikkurim procedure.* Why was Reading not mentioned?*Rav Ashi: Since a ger who brings _bikkurim_ cannot read* a _parsha_ that discusses “our fathers”, Reading was not mentioned. *This _beraisa_ is thus not a proof to Rav Sheishes.**Challenge:* Why is the *“Tzad Hashaveh”* method not employed by this _beraisa? (When you can refute two sources for a law in different ways, you combine the two, and deduce from both together),_*Resolution:* Both sources share *a common denominator that is absent* in the case of _maaser sheini._ See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information. This podcast has been graciously sponsored by JewishPodcasts.fm. There is much overhead to maintain this service so please help us continue our goal of helping Jewish lecturers become podcasters and support us with a donation: https://thechesedfund.com/jewishpodcasts/donate