*29.1 Makkos Daf 19 A (2 lines Up)*

*29.1 Makkos Daf 19 A (2 lines Up)**Today’s learning sponsored by**Sponsor a day's learning* (thousands of minutes!) For only 50 *click here:*https://www.flipcause.com/secure/cause_pdetails/ODUwOTUWe learned a beraisa (28.4) regarding the permissibility of eating _maaser sheini_ in Yerushalayim after the churban. In 28.6 it was explained that since the _zerikah_ of a _bechor_ requires a _mizbeach,_ we learn a _hekesh_ that eating the _bechor_ also requires a mizbeach.*Summary**Challenge:* A _(kodshim)_ law derived by _hekesh_ cannot be applied elsewhere by means of a _hekesh!_*Resolution:* _Maaser sheini_ is not kodshim so there are no limitations to what laws can be derived there.*Challenge:* That works only if we look at the learner _[maaser]_ which is not _kodshim._ But the teacher _[bechor]_ is _kodshim._*Resolution:* Actually the law is not derived from eating the _bechor_ which is derived from _zerikas hadam_ of the bechor. Rather the law of _maaser_ is derived from _bechor_ , by means of only one _hekesh._ See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information. This podcast has been graciously sponsored by JewishPodcasts.fm. There is much overhead to maintain this service so please help us continue our goal of helping Jewish lecturers become podcasters and support us with a donation: https://thechesedfund.com/jewishpodcasts/donate