*29.6 Makkos Daf 19 B (3 lines Up)*

*29.6 Makkos Daf 19 B (3 lines Up)*Rabbi Asi quoting Rabbi Yochanan: One is only liable for eating unredeemed maaser sheini if it was already brought up to Yerushalayim.*Summary**Challenge:**Beraisa: Rabbi Yosi:* A _kohen_ *in Yerushalayim,* during a year of _maaser sheini_ who wishes to eat a tevel fig and he separates *Terumah, Maaser Rishon and Maaser Sheini, gets _malkos_* _[because he didn’t separate terumas maaser]._ *A zar would receive _malkos_ twice* _[for eating terumah and terumas maaser]._If he hadn’t said anything he would only receive _malkos_ once, for eating _tevel._This is only because he is in Yerushalayim, *outside of Yerushalayim he would be liable for three sets of _malkos_* _[for eating maaser sheini outside of Yerushalayim - even though it was never in Yerushalayim - contrary to the ruling of Rabbi Yochanan]_?!*Resolution: True. He would have only been liable for a third _malkos_ if he had taken it out of Yerushalayim.* See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information. This podcast has been graciously sponsored by JewishPodcasts.fm. There is much overhead to maintain this service so please help us continue our goal of helping Jewish lecturers become podcasters and support us with a donation: https://thechesedfund.com/jewishpodcasts/donate