*3.2-Makkos Daf 03 A (6 Lines Dn)*

*3.2-Makkos Daf 03 A (6 Lines Dn)**Rabbi Miller learned Tosefos here. In order to keep the shiur at 5 minutes we took it out. However you can listen to the full recordinghere.* http://chilp.it/b490748Tosefos is mentioned in the footnote.*Summary**Rav Yehuda amar Rav:*An _eid zomeim_ pays *according to his part.*▪Explanation A: This refers to a case where *only one _eid_ was _huzam_*_(found guilty by _hazamah_ ).Objection: The _beraisa_ says: _Hazamah_ only applies when *both witnesses* are _huzam_ together.▪Explanation B: *Rava:* This refers to a case where *one _eid_ admits* that he testified falsely¤.Objection: Once a testimony is accepted it *cannot be retracted.*▪Explanation C: This refers to a case where one _eid_ testifies that he was *_huzam_ in a different _beis din._* The _eid_ who admits to the _hazamah_ , pays his share.This explanation is *not in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Akiva* that _zoimemim_ do not pay by their own admission.▪Explanation D: This refers to a case where one _eid_ testifies that they were _huzam_ in a different beis din *who issued a ruling* holding them liable. Once a ruling is issued, it is binding (it is no longer considered merely a _knas_ ).Although the single eid cannot make his partner liable, he still must *pay his part.*_______*¤Tosefos 1:* And he was _huzam_ . This podcast has been graciously sponsored by JewishPodcasts.fm. There is much overhead to maintain this service so please help us continue our goal of helping Jewish lecturers become podcasters and support us with a donation: https://thechesedfund.com/jewishpodcasts/donate