Skip to content
#31 - Challenging the 4-Function Worldview w/ Dr. Adithyan "Dithu" Rajaraman episode artwork

Jun 1, 2025 1 hr 48 min

#31 - Challenging the 4-Function Worldview w/ Dr. Adithyan "Dithu" Rajaraman

from Functional Relations Hosted by Zachary Bird, PhD, BCBA-D and Caleb Davis, PhD, BCBA-D

In this episode Zach and Caleb are joined by Dr. Adithyan "Dithu" Rajaraman where the discussion focuses on challenging the 4-function worldview in the context of assessing and treating problem behavior. 2 CEs (BACB, IBAO, and/or QABA) are available for this episode. You can purchase them at https://www.functionalrelationspodcast.com If you feel that our podcast is a valuable contribution to the field of ABA, please consider supporting us on Patreon at https://www.patreon.com/functionalrelationspodcast To connect with Dithu and the FTF team for a number of different types of support in serving individuals with severe problem behavior (among other behavioral challenges), click here: https://ftfbc.com/contact-us/ References: Pertaining to Mand compliance: 1. Seminal Paper: Bowman, L. G., Fisher, W. W., Thompson, R. H., & Piazza, C. C. (1997). On the relation of mands and the function of destructive behavior. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 30(2), 251-265. 2. Literature review: Rajaraman, A., & Hanley, G. P. (2021). Mand compliance as a contingency controlling problem behavior: A systematic review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 54(1), 103-121. Pertaining to the evolution of functional analysis: 1. Carr, E. G. (1977). The motivation of self-injurious behavior: a review of some hypotheses. Psychological bulletin, 84(4), 800. 2. Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self‐injury. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 27(2), 197-209. 3. Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & McCord, B. E. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A review. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 36(2), 147-185. On Literature reviews: Narrative review examples: 1. Thompson, R. H., & Iwata, B. A. (2005). A review of reinforcement control procedures. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 38(2), 257-278. 2. Friman, P. C., Hayes, S. C., & Wilson, K. G. (1998). Why behavior analysts should study emotion: The example of anxiety. Journal of applied Behavior analysis, 31(1), 137-156. 3. Rajaraman, A., Austin, J. L., Gover, H. C., Cammilleri, A. P., Donnelly, D. R., & Hanley, G. P. (2022). Toward trauma‐informed applications of behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 55(1), 40-61. Systematic or Scoping review (not meta-analyses) examples relevant to the discussion: 1. Jessel, J., Hanley, G. P., & Ghaemmaghami, M. (2020). On the standardization of the functional analysis. Behavior analysis in practice, 13, 205-216. 2. Ghaemmaghami, M., Hanley, G. P., & Jessel, J. (2021). Functional communication training: From efficacy to effectiveness. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 54(1), 122-143. 3. Howell, M., Dounavi, K., & Storey, C. (2019). To choose or not to choose?: A systematic literature review considering the effects of antecedent and consequence choice upon on-task and problem behaviour. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 6, 63-84. 4. Hustyi, K. M., Logue, J. J., & Hall, S. S. (2025). Skill-based treatment for challenging behavior in autism spectrum disorder: A scoping review of treatment characteristics and outcomes. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 119, 102523. 5. Cengher, M., Bowman, M. D., Shawler, L. A., & Ceribo‐Singh, M. S. M. (2022). A systematic review of mands for information. Behavioral Interventions, 37(3), 864-886. Meta-analyses examples relevant to the discussion: 1. Gover, H. C., Hanley, G. P., & Ruppel, K. W. (2022). On the generality of preference for contingent reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 55(2), 318-336. 2. Slaton, J. D., & Hanley, G. P. (2018). Nature and scope of synthesis in functional analysis and treatment of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51(4), 943-973. 3. Layman, L. N., Dufrene, B. A., Ackley, M. M., Weaver, C. M., Schneider, D. E., LaBrot, Z. C., ... & Olmi, D. J. (2024). Interview-informed synthesized contingency analyses on challenging problem behavior: A single-case meta-analysis. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 11(3), 640-658.

Episode details come from the podcast's RSS feed.

Embed this episode

Ready to play

#31 - Challenging the 4-Function Worldview w/ Dr. Adithyan "Dithu" Rajaraman

0:00 1:48:15

No transcript yet.

Requests help us decide what to transcribe next.

Share this episode

Similar podcasts

Les secrets de la Manipulation Marie-Laure Cuzacq et Anne Guibert La manipulation est une notion plurielle, affectant notre vie relationnelle, professionnelle, affective, familiale… Nous allons donc essayer d’aborder cette question de la même façon. Nous balayerons ainsi le large spectre de la manipulation : de la plus bénigne à la plus dangereuse, de la plus inoffensive à la plus destructrice. Découvrez quelques outils théoriques et pratiques pour mieux comprendre… la nature humaine. Car étudier la manipulation, c’est étudier les petits et grands secrets de l’être humain : ses désirs, ses intentions, ses motivations, ses émotions. C’est aussi, de façon plus pratique, avoir une vision plus claire des échanges et des relations avec nos proches, nos collègues, nos amis...Retrouvez l'intégralité des 30 chapitres des secrets de la Manipulation, en audiobooks, sur Audible, Itunes, Kobo ... Hébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations. U Rising University of Utah At the University of Utah, we have a saying: Imagine, then do. On U Rising, you’ll hear stories from our faculty, staff and students that bring those words to life. We'll share inspiring, innovative and impactful initiatives that are benefitting our community and the world. U Rising is hosted by Chris Nelson and Julie Kiefer. Chris, who has more than 26 years of experience in higher education and academic health care, is the chief university relations officer and secretary to the university. He has served six university presidents and dozens of senior leaders in health care and higher education, creating and executing strategies to help health care and higher education organizations advance their brand and philanthropic goals. He has bachelor of science degrees in political science and broadcast journalism and a master of public administration, all from the University of Utah. Julie is the associate director of science communications at University of Uta

Frequently asked questions

How long is this episode of Functional Relations?

This episode is 1 hour and 48 minutes long.

When was this Functional Relations episode published?

This episode was published on June 1, 2025.

Can I download this Functional Relations episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.