3213 Sexual Market Value Olympics - Call In Show - February 19th, 2016

Question 1: [1:50] – “Stefan has said that using coercion to prevent immigrants from entering the United States is justified because they are likely to use welfare and vote to enlarge the welfare state. However, this (the statistical likelihood that someone will receive welfare or vote to support it) seems like an unacceptable justification for the use of force in general. For example, we wouldn't accept that coercing American citizens - say, by restricting their reproduction or movement - is justified in order to prevent them or their descendants from using welfare?”Question 2: [1:18:47] – “I believe that all women are hypergamous (in terms of always looking for the next guy with more resources), and that I believe this nature is fixed. I believe that in order for any meaningful change to happen, regardless of what that change might be, that change will have to be done using force, since women are the majority of the voting population, and I simply don't see women voluntarily voting for a system that limits their influence on politics and on society at large. Is human nature fixed, specifically female nature (in terms of hypergamy), and will the only way to make any meaningful change is to implement an Islamic-style Patriarchy, making women the lawful property of men?”Question 3: [2:23:00] – “I am a 27-year-old in love. The girl I love is into polyamory and has a hard time sticking to one guy. She is only 21 and is therefore younger than me. I refuse to degrade myself as a man and as her elder by ending up as "just another guy". The logical, experienced side of me says she is a "no go", but I have a hard time restraining my emotions and desires. Should I confess my true feelings to this young woman, or should I walk away with dignity and "go my own way" until either she is older and more mature, or until an opportunity presents itself to enrapture her? Or should I write her off altogether as toxic?”