*33.3 Makkos Daf 22 A (3 lines Dn)*

*33.3 Makkos Daf 22 A (3 lines Dn)*We learned in the _mishna_ (32.3) that there’s a case where a man can plow one row and be liable for eight _malkos._ Rava explained that there are only eight because _“ein chiluk melachos b’yom tov”.__Abayye_ referenced a different _mishna_ which teaches that one who cooks and eats gid hanashe on _yom tov_can be liable for five _malkos._ However according to the principle of _“ein chiluk melachos b’yom tov”_ there should only be four _malkos_ . To resolve this challenge “Lighting a fire on _yom tov”_ was replaced with “Eating _neveilah”._*Summary**Challenge: In Rabbi Chiya’s beraisa* it states regarding this case: “Two liabilities for eating and three for cooking.'' However, if we replace lighting a fire with eating _neveilah,_ *there are three liabilities for eating and two for cooking?**Resolution:* Replace “Lighting a fire on Yom Tov” with *“Lighting a fire with Asherah twigs”* which is forbidden based on the _possuk_ “Nothing [of _avodah zarah_ ] should cling to your hands”.*Rav Acha brei D’Rava to Rav Ashi:* If we’re discussing using _avodah zarah_ objects *there should be a sixth _lav_* : “Do not bring an abomination into your house”.*Resolution:* Replace “Lighting a fire with Asherah twigs” with *“Lighting a fire with Hekdesh twigs”* which is forbidden* based on the _possuk_ “Destroy all _avodah zarah,_ do not do so to Hashem”.*Challenge***: Our _mishna_ (32.3) could have also counted *“One who sows in Nachal Eisan”* _(The place where the eglah arufah ceremony was performed, which must remain desolate as a memorial to the murdered man)_ which is forbidden based on the _possuk_ “Nothing should be planted there”.*Challenge:* Our _mishna_ (32.3) could have also counted *“He erased Hashem’s name while plowing”* _(Hashem’s name was engraved on a rock which he broke up while plowing)_ which is forbidden based on the _possuk_ “Destroy the names of _avodah zarah,_ do not do so to Hashem”.________________________**Tosfos* explains why the _lav_ of _meilah_ is not counted (based on 33.5), see separate recording.** The gemara asks several questions with no answers, we are thus forced to admit that some possible cases may have been left out of the _mishna._ While this was rejected by Ulla (33.1), that was with regard to “Yom Tov” cases. Since yom tov was mentioned in the _mishna,_ it is inconceivable that the _mishna_ would not mention all cases of yom tov. However now we are raising new scenarios which are in fact likely to have been left out. *Tosfos.* See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information. This podcast has been graciously sponsored by JewishPodcasts.fm. There is much overhead to maintain this service so please help us continue our goal of helping Jewish lecturers become podcasters and support us with a donation: https://thechesedfund.com/jewishpodcasts/donate