4: Meta-analysis or mega-silliness? episode artwork

EPISODE · Mar 22, 2016 · 39 MIN

4: Meta-analysis or mega-silliness?

from Everything Hertz · host Dan Quintana

Meta-analysis has become an increasingly popular tool used by many scientists to synthesise data. However, it's not without its detractors — from H. J. Eysenck, Ph.D., calling it "an exercise in mega-silliness" in 1978, to J. A. J. Heathers Ph.D., describing its use as a "profound moral failing" (he's half-serious) in 2016. In this episode, Dan defends meta-analysis against more recent criticisms put forward by James and offers suggestions on how meta-analysis can be improved. Links: PRISMA statement - http://www.prisma-statement.org/ Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/ Twitter - https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Mar 22, 2016

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

4: Meta-analysis or mega-silliness?

0:00 39:46

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Everything Hertz?

This episode is 39 minutes long.

When was this Everything Hertz episode published?

This episode was published on March 22, 2016.

Can I download this Everything Hertz episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!