#41: JCC: Abbreviations confuse elderly millennials as we look into latest CJEU cases episode artwork

EPISODE · Sep 17, 2023 · 1H 29M

#41: JCC: Abbreviations confuse elderly millennials as we look into latest CJEU cases

from PrivacyPod

Joost Case Corner (JCC) is back! As per usual, there's no way we will cover all of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) goodness in under one hour, so buckle up for an extra-long special episode. Its a perfect catch up with the lates court action and since its been a while, we can hear our presenters (Milla mainly) trip over some pretty basic EU abbreviations. So all you EU nerds there, prepare to scream really hard to your earphones what TFEU stands for. We discuss three cases with final judgments already out there: Meta v Bundeskartellamt (C-252/21), Pankki S (C-579/21) and Lietuvos Respublikos (C-162/22).  Under our section on ongoing cases we go through five cases that will likely shake the privacy world once decided: ILVA (C-383/23), Mousse (C-394/23), Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde (C-416/23, which Milla can pronounce perfectly, just wait for it), IAB Europe (C-604/22, sad that Heikki isnt here to rant) EDPS v SRB (C-413/23 P, yes, that annoying pseudonyisation case where normies claim that GDPR doesnt apply). The cases cover definition of personal data, pseudonymization and anonymization, calculation of fines and much more. We know, you might be a bit lagging behind on the case law, so no worries! This is your cue to press play and dig through the intricacies of data protection case law with Joost, Milla and Pilvi.   Cases covered in the episode:   Cases with final judgments: Meta v Bundeskartellamt (C-252/21) Pankki S (C-579/21) Lietuvos Respublikos (C-162/22)   Ongoing cases: ILVA (C-383/23) Mousse (C-394/23)  Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde (C-416/23) IAB Europe (C-604/22)  EDPS v SRB (C-413/23 P)   Did you enjoy our show? Support us by buying us a coffee here: https://bmc.link/privacypod4u We would love to get feedback – so please tag us, follow us, DM us, or send us traditional email: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PodPrivacy, #privacypod Instagram: @privacypod LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/tietosuojapod/about/ Email: [email protected]  

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Sep 17, 2023

NOW PLAYING

#41: JCC: Abbreviations confuse elderly millennials as we look into latest CJEU cases

0:00 1:29:07

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of PrivacyPod?

This episode is 1 hour and 29 minutes long.

When was this PrivacyPod episode published?

This episode was published on September 17, 2023.

What is this episode about?

Joost Case Corner (JCC) is back! As per usual, there's no way we will cover all of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) goodness in under one hour, so buckle up for an extra-long special episode. Its a perfect catch up with the lates...

Can I download this PrivacyPod episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!