47: Truth bombs from a methodological freedom fighter (with Anne Scheel)

In this episode, Dan and James are joined by Anne Scheel (LMU Munich) to discuss open science advocacy. Highlights: How Anne became an open science advocate Open science is better science Methodological terrorists/freedom fighters The time Anne stood up after a conference keynote and asked a question Asking poor PhD students to pay for conference costs upfront and then reimbursing them 6 months later Is it worth if for early career researchers to push open science practices? How to begin with implementing open science practices Power analysis should be normal practice, it shouldn’t be controversial Anne’s going to start a podcast The 100%CI: A long copy blog with 4 writers The benefits of preprints and blogging Science communication in English for non-native English speakers Doing stuff that interests you vs. stuff that’s meant to advance your career Twitter accounts of people/things we mentioned: @dalejbarr - 2:10 @siminevazire - 2:45 @lakens - 2:45 @nicebread303 (Felix Schönbrodt)- 3:50 @annaveer - 21:40 @methodpodcast - 29:20 @the100ci - 30:40 @realscientists - 31:40 @upulie - 31:55 @fMRI_guy (Jens Foell) - 32:20 @realsci_DE (Real scientists Germany) - 32:30 @maltoesermalte, @_r_c_a, @dingding_peng (100% CI team) - 33:55 @stuartJRitchie - 65:05 Links Early Career Researchers and publishing practices: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1102/full (paywalled) Pre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template” Paywalled link: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103116301925, Preprint link: https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/4frms/ The CI 100%: http://www.the100.ci Music credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/Special Guest: Anne Scheel.