48. Priest of "El Elyon" | Why Melchizedek May Not Have Been a Priest to Yahweh episode artwork

EPISODE · Mar 13, 2026 · 1H 4M

48. Priest of "El Elyon" | Why Melchizedek May Not Have Been a Priest to Yahweh

from Buried Bible Podcast · host Dr. Mark Chavalas

When Genesis calls Melchizedek a priest of “El Elyon,” what is the text actually claiming?“El Elyon” (God Most High) shows up in Genesis 14 right at the center of the Melchizedek story—and it’s easy to assume that automatically equals Yahweh. The problem? That title isn’t exclusive to Yahweh—it appears in extra-biblical sources and broader ancient Near Eastern usage. In Genesis 14, Melchizedek invokes El Elyon generally, while Abraham explicitly names Yahweh and applies the same “Most High” title—suggesting Israel appropriates a known divine title rather than proving Melchizedek was a Yahweh worshiper. That all leads to the BIG QUESTION: if the title isn’t exclusive, what does that suggest about whether Melchizedek was actually a Canaanite priest-king? And why does this figure later get “upgraded” into something far more cosmic by the time we reach Hebrews?Key Points:➡️ “El Elyon” is a shared ancient title, not a Yahweh-only label.(Its presence in Genesis 14 doesn’t automatically make Melchizedek a worshiper of Israel’s God.)➡️ Genesis 14 shows a key distinction: Melchizedek uses the title; Abraham names Yahweh.(Abraham’s move shows how Israelites could claim “Most High” language for Yahweh while speaking in a Canaanite setting.)➡️ This phrase becomes a bridge to later theology.(Understanding El Elyon helps explain why Melchizedek could later be reinterpreted and elevated through Psalm 110 and eventually used powerfully in Hebrews.)Sources mentioned / texts discussed Bible passages: Genesis 14 - Numbers 24 - Psalms 83 & 97 - Isaiah 14 - Daniel 7 - Deuteronomy 32:8–9 - Acts 7&16 - Psalm 110Extra-biblical / scholarly:📖 Sefire (Sfire) Aramaic treaty (via Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament / Pritchard; trans. Franz Rosenthal)📖 Eusebius of Caesarea quoting Philo of Byblos / Sanchuniathon traditions (El/Elleun “Most High”)📖 Kumarbi myth (Hurrian/Hittite tradition; Hoffner’s translations)📖 Hasmonean-era references to “High Priest of Elyon” (via Josephus discussion)📖 John Hilber, “Psalm 110 in Light of Assyrian Prophecies,” Vetus Testamentum (2003)📖 James Kugel, Traditions of the Bible (Melchizedek section)Mention: John Walton & “Aubrey Buster” Daniel commentary (forthcoming/part-released as discussed)

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Mar 13, 2026

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

48. Priest of "El Elyon" | Why Melchizedek May Not Have Been a Priest to Yahweh

0:00 1:04:41

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Buried Bible Podcast?

This episode is 1 hour and 4 minutes long.

When was this Buried Bible Podcast episode published?

This episode was published on March 13, 2026.

Can I download this Buried Bible Podcast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!