Skip to content
#49 Condition, innominate or will-o'-the wisp? episode artwork

EPISODE · Dec 7, 2022 · 44 MIN

#49 Condition, innominate or will-o'-the wisp?

from Case by Case · host Floyd Zadkovich

In this second of their trilogy of 'look-back' cases, Luke and Calum explore the salient case of Bunge Corporation (New York) v Tradax Export SA (Panama) [1981] APP.L.R. 02/25. As Luke is preparing to launch the inaugural course on International Shipping and Commodities Law at the University of Wollongong, he reviews key older cases in the process. Ever wondered why time-based delivery clauses in a commodities sale and purchase contract are (typically) considered to be conditions? Ever wondered what is an innominate term? Ever wondered how to tell the difference between a condition and an innominate term? Ever wondered what is a 'will-o'-the-wisp'? Listen in for answers and check out our ⁠YouTube channel.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Dec 7, 2022

Embed this episode

Ready to play

#49 Condition, innominate or will-o'-the wisp?

0:00 44:06

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Case by Case?

This episode is 44 minutes long.

When was this Case by Case episode published?

This episode was published on December 7, 2022.

Can I download this Case by Case episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!