*5.2-Makkos Daf 04 A (10 lines Up)*

*5.2-Makkos Daf 04 A (10 lines Up)**Summary**Mishna: Rabbi Meir:* Witnesses testified that A *owes* B two hundred _sus_ and they are found to be _zoimemim,_ they *get malkos* for giving false testimony ( _Lo sa’aneh_ ), and they *also have to pay* because of _ka’asher zamam_ . They receive two punishments because each is based on a *different “name"* .°*Chachomim:* If they have to pay, they cannot receive malkos. (The gemara asks that in general, the opposite is true - one who receives malkos doesn’t pay, see 5.?).(There is a general rule that we cannot give two punishments for one sin, this is the reasoning of the Chachomim. However Rabbi Meir holds that _hazamah_ is _knas_ and thus not limited by the laws of regular punishments; 3.1, 5.3).Mishna continues: *Rabbi Meir:* Witnesses testified that A ate _neveilah_ and *deserves _malkos_* and they are found to be _zoimemim,_ they *get _malkos_ twice* for _Lo sa’aneh,_ and for _ka’asher zamam._*Chachomim:* They only receive _malkos_ once.° *Rashi;* Ordinarily we say that they only receive the more severe punishment, however since here there are two different _pesukim_ and thus two separate sins, they receive both punishments.*Tosafos:* _Lo sa’aneh_ is not connected with _hazamah,_ as such it remains an independent _lav_ and requires punishment. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information. This podcast has been graciously sponsored by JewishPodcasts.fm. There is much overhead to maintain this service so please help us continue our goal of helping Jewish lecturers become podcasters and support us with a donation: https://thechesedfund.com/jewishpodcasts/donate