5 Running Studies That Actually Matter in 2025 (Skip the Hype)

We break down the five most important running studies of 2025 and give you a framework for deciding which science actually deserves your attention, and what's just expensive distraction. Plus, we debunk the hype around ketone supplements and Norwegian double threshold training.What We Cover:The "Should I Care" framework for evaluating new researchWhy strict 80/20 polarization isn't magic for recreational athletesHow strength training improved time-to-exhaustion by 35%The fueling gap: marathoners averaged just 22-35g carbs/hour vs. the 60-90g recommendedWhy poor sleepers are 1.78x more likely to get injuredThe single-session spike that increases injury risk by 128%Resources:Tom Ralph's fueling tracking app: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/fuelflow/id6755150914Training PeaksHRV for Training appStudies Referenced:Rosenblatt et al 2025 (Polarized Training)Zanini et al 2025 (Strength Training)de Jong et al 2025 (Sleep)Franson et al 2025 (Injury Risk)Work With Us:One coaching spot available with TJ! Don't wait until January 1 reach out today. Microcosm-coaching.com