50: Special 50th episode (LIVE)

Dan and James celebrate their 50th episode with a live recording! They cover a blog post that argues grad students shouldn’t be publishing, what’s expected of today’s postdocs, and the ‘tone’ debate in psychology. BONUS: You can also watch the video of this episode on the Everything Hertz podcast channel (link below) Other stuff they cover: James offends a sociologist, as is his wont The argument for why grad students shouldn’t publish Gatekeepers controlling what’s being published Editors that Google authors before sending papers out for review Judging researchers on their institution’s location James on networking How do you challenge reviewers when they say you are "too junior" The standards of Frontiers papers Writing review papers for the wrong reasons Why are there so many meta-analyses? Pre-registering your meta-analysis Registered reports vs. pre-registration What’s expected of today’s postdocs How many papers should you peer review? How James tried to ward off review requests Things that millennials are ruining The role of humour in the tone debate Links Episode video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pj3WsTiUuLo&t=3s The “should grad students publish" article: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2017/08/23/renewed-debate-over-whether-graduate-students-should-publish#.WaGAeN_v8jI.link Prospero meta-analysis registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ Eiko Fried’s tweet on postdoc expectations: https://twitter.com/eikofried/status/902470702892290048 James’ publons profile: https://publons.com/author/1171358/james-aj-heathers#profile JANE: http://jane.biosemantics.org Anonymous PubPeer comments: https://pubpeer.com/publications/0E0DAEBEC6183646F18F4FAED03B1A#7