6) Suppressed and new evidence

Carelessness or malfeasance? Years after Jens Soering’s conviction, various new pieces of evidence came to light. The jury at his trial was never told about the results of a luminol test on the getaway car, chief investigator Chuck Reid did not testify as a witness - on top of that: in 2016 the existence of a drawn up FBI perpetrator profile from 1985 is denied. Procedural errors by the court in Bedford and a failure of the criminal defense attorney, who later lost his license because of errors he made in Soering’s case? Does new and suppressed evidence provide a different view on the verdict 33 years later?More on this in this episode of the podcast “The Jens Soering Case – A New Verdict.”Due to the international nature of the case, the original voices of Daniela and Ralph were replaced with English AI voices so that English-speaking listeners can also enjoy the podcast. However, in Episode 10, you will hear the original voices of the two hosts.If you want to learn more about the Jens Soering case, Investigator Chuck Reid shares his perspective in an exclusive report. He delves into observations and evidence that didn't even come to light during the original trial.For more information, check out:www.soering-case.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices