64. Should we dispose of bodies in a more environmentally friendly way? With Sarah Carter-Walshaw episode artwork

EPISODE · Jul 6, 2026 · 47 MIN

64. Should we dispose of bodies in a more environmentally friendly way? With Sarah Carter-Walshaw

from Ethics Untangled · host Jim Baxter

Send us Fan MailContent warning: This episode contains frank discussion of death and of various forms of body disposal, which some might find distressing.Sarah Carter-Walshaw, Lecturer in Applied and Inter-Disciplinary Ethics at IDEA, The Ethics Centre at the University of Leeds, has been thinking about the ethics of what happens to us after we die. The problem is that the current most popular methods of body disposal - cremation and burial, aren't very environmentally friendly. The good news is that other, greener methods are available. The bad news is that, so far at least, these haven’t really caught on. In this conversation we discuss why not, as well as the ethical question of whether we have an obligation to consider these forms of body disposal for ourselves.Sarah is holding a virtual workshop on body disposal ethics at IDEA: The Ethics Centre, University of Leeds on 9 July 2026. Register for free here: https://forms.cloud.microsoft/e/4RXPASJpiW.Further Reading:Balonier, AK, Parsons, E, & Patterson, A. The unnaturalness of natural burials: dispossessing the dispossessed. Mortality. 24(2), pp.212–230Booth, R. 2023. The Guardian: 'Boil in the bag’ environmentally friendly funerals arrive in the UK.Darwall, Stephen. 2017. “What Are Moral Reasons?” The Amherst Lecture in Philosophy 12: 1–24.Dembosky, A. 2024. NPR: The ultimate green burial? Human composting lets you replenish the earth after death.Mason, A. 2023. What’s Wrong with Lookism? Personal Appearance, Discrimination, and Disadvantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.​Rieder, TN & Bernstein, J. 2020. The Case of ‘Contributory Ethics’: Or How to Think about Individual Morality in a Time of Global Problems. Ethics, Policy & Environment. 23(3), pp.299-319.   ​Schafer, C (2012) Corpses, conflict and insignificance? A critical analysis of post-mortem practices. Mortality. 17(4), pp.305-321. ​Schwenkenbecher, A. 2014. Is there an obligation to reduce one’s individual carbon footprint? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 17(2), pp.168-188. Ethics Untangled is produced by IDEA, The Ethics Centre at the University of Leeds.As well as the podcast, Ethics Untangled is also the name for the long-form online presence of IDEA.Bluesky: @ethicsuntangled.bluesky.socialInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/idea_leeds/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ideacetlLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/idea-ethics-centre/

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jul 6, 2026

Embed this episode

Send us Fan Mail Content warning: This episode contains frank discussion of death and of various forms of body disposal, which some might find distressing. Sarah Carter-Walshaw, Lecturer in Applied and Inter-Disciplinary Ethics at IDEA, The Ethics Centre at the University of Leeds, has been thinking about the ethics of what happens to us after we die. The problem is that the current most popular methods of body disposal - cremation and burial, aren't very environmentally friendly. The good ne...

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

NOW PLAYING

64. Should we dispose of bodies in a more environmentally friendly way? With Sarah Carter-Walshaw

0:00 47:29

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Ethics Untangled?

This episode is 47 minutes long.

When was this Ethics Untangled episode published?

This episode was published on July 6, 2026.

Can I download this Ethics Untangled episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!