65. Michael Slote | Mind episode artwork

EPISODE · Aug 13, 2024 · 1H 24M

65. Michael Slote | Mind

from Friction · host Friction

Can Western philosophy really understand belief and rationality without emotion, or do we need the kind of “heart-mind” yin-and-yang framework that Michael Slote defends here?My links: https://linktr.ee/frictionphilosophy.1. GuestMichael Slote is Professor Emeritus at the University of Miami, and his research focuses on ethics and mind, and especially on virtues, sentimentalism, and related topics.2. Interview SummaryMichael Slote argues that the standard Western philosophical picture of the mind needs a “major course correction,” because it treats cognition as able (in principle) to operate independently of emotion and motivation—whereas East Asian traditions instead assume a ‘heart-mind’ in which these are inseparable. To motivate his alternative, he reconstructs ‘yin’/‘yang’ in a modernized way: the old “oppositional forces in nature” reading (often paired with bad pseudo-explanations and sexist associations) should be discarded, while a minority tradition treats ‘yin’ and ‘yang’ as necessary complements that accommodate each other. On Slote’s proposal, ‘yin’ is receptivity and ‘yang’ is directed purpose, and he uses curiosity as an intuitive case where openness to what’s happening already involves an active, selective focus.From there, Slote presses the claim that emotion is not a “mere add-on” to belief and reasoning, but shows up inside their normal structure. One argument appeals to “epistemic feelings”: if confidence is commonly treated as a kind of strong belief and as something we feel, then belief belongs on the same scale and should involve feeling too (even if not the same kind as anger or love). He also argues that belief has a built-in motivational (‘yang’) side—partly by analogy with theoretical reasoning (to believe P is to be committed to using P in inference), and partly by criticizing the tradition (e.g., David Hume and Donald Davidson) that treats belief as “causally inert”: if belief is inert, it’s hard to explain everyday instrumental action like learning there’s no food at home and then going out to find food. Slote extends the same yin/yang lens to empathy, arguing that full empathy includes taking in the intentional object of another’s feeling, and that once you share distress at a pain, some motivation to relieve it comes along “analytically,” not contingently.Finally, Slote draws out implications for value and for diagnosing dysfunction. Because receptivity and directed purpose are both things we admire (open-mindedness, curiosity, steadiness of purpose), their inseparable unity itself becomes something we value; and the contrast between compassionate people and psychopaths can be described as the presence vs. absence of this yin/yang structure, especially in empathic perception and the motivation to help. He also addresses a key worry about saying belief involves “favoring”: a person can ‘yin-favor’ a hypothesis (treat it as epistemically supported) while not ‘yang-favoring’ it (not preferring it in the practical, desirous sense)—illustrated by the example of a husband who comes to believe his wife was unfaithful despite strongly wishing it weren’t true. Across the interview, Slote presents this as a cross-cultural corrective: not just “different concepts,” but a case where Western philosophy has mis-theorized its own mental-life concepts, and where taking the resources of Chinese philosophy seriously could reshape how we think about mind, rationality, and agency.3. Interview Chapters00:00 - Introduction00:58 - Yin/yang of pervasive emotion02:17 - Updating yin/yang07:30 - Reception of the view08:52 - Problems with the Western view of the mind11:25 - Argument for belief involving emotion13:04 - Feeling of a different sort?14:33 - Mental theorizing too simple?18:09 - Active element as not constitutive35:50 - Criticism of Hume37:08 - External connection?38:12 - Examples40:06 - Eastern philosophy in the West43:37 - Yin-favoring vs. yang-favoring49:47 - Irrationality and deplorable states56:12 - Beliefs and desires as the same sort of state59:32 - Wider applications1:03:52 - Depression and cultivating yin/yang1:10:06 - Future research1:12:03 - Degrees of yin/yang1:14:55 - Lessons from Eastern philosophy1:18:21 - Skeptical concern1:20:43 - Value of philosophy1:24:31 - Conclusion This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit fric.substack.com/subscribe

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Aug 13, 2024

Embed this episode

NOW PLAYING

65. Michael Slote | Mind

0:00 1:24:45

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

Science Friction ABC Australia In humanity's next giant leap, astronauts are heading back to the Moon for the first time in more than 50 years.We'll bring you daily Artemis II mission updates, from lift-off to splashdown, and answer your questions about life as an astronaut, the science of spaceflight, and plans to venture beyond the Moon.The Challenger Legacy (Season 5) In January 1986, the Challenger space shuttle disintegrated 73 seconds after lift-off. This is the story of how the tragedy unfolded, the engineers who tried to stop it — and the enduring consequences for humanity's exploration of space. Artificial Evolution (Season 4): Three decades ago, Dolly the Sheep became the first ever cloned mammal. Nearly 30 years later, genetic technology has reshaped the world around us. Environment reporter Peter de Kruijff explores what's changed, where we are headed, and whether we're okay with it.Brain Rot (Season 3): How does being chronically online affect our brains? Technology reporter Ange Lavoipierre explor Leading Human Chad Prevost You've achieved the success. You've checked the boxes. But something still feels off.Welcome to Leading Human—a podcast for high-achieving leaders, founders, and mission-driven professionals who are questioning whether the life they built is actually the life they want. This isn't about productivity hacks or surface-level self-care. This is about the real work: reclaiming your authentic self beneath the conditioning, the burnout, and the unconscious patterns running your life.Hosted by Chad Prevost (and sometimes Shelley), co-founders of Big Self School, Leading Human explores conscious leadership through the lens of depth psychology, the Enneagram, and the emerging role of AI in human development. We believe burnout isn't something that happens *to* you—it's something that happens *for* you. It's a soul crisis revealing where you've been abandoning yourself.Each episode tackles the friction between who you are and who you've become. We explore how personality operates beneath the s Learning From The Edges Michelle Parry-Slater The world of work is full of friction. Departments work in silos. Work gets stuck. Teams find workplaces are not as easeful as they could or should be. And in all of this human beings are caught in the challenges, resulting in poor work, mental health worries and worse. As a research project, Learning From The Edges will look at the edges of work, where friction exists and explore what gets in the way of work and of learning. Why is there friction? How can work be more fruitful for organisations and people? What barriers do people have and what practical ways they can overcome those barriers? Join us with your thoughts on Twitter @LearningEdges or on our LinkedIn page.  Origin Story Podmasters What are the real stories behind the most misunderstood and abused ideas in politics? From Conspiracy Theory to Woke to Centrism and beyond, Ian Dunt and Dorian Lynskey dig into the astonishing secret histories of concepts you thought you knew.Want to support us in making future seasons? There are now two ways you can help out:• Patreon – Get early episodes, live Zooms, merchandise and more from just £5 per month.• Apple Podcasts – Want everything in one place with one easy payment? Subscribe to our premium feed on Apple Podcasts for ad-free shows early and bonus editions too.From Podmasters, the makers of Oh God, What Now?, American Friction and The Bunker.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Friction?

This episode is 1 hour and 24 minutes long.

When was this Friction episode published?

This episode was published on August 13, 2024.

Can I download this Friction episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!