68. Commercial contracts: the issues of implied terms or unjust enrichment

Does silence really speak volumes? In this podcast, our Commercial Litigation team explores the issues of implied terms and unjust enrichment  Party A agrees to pay Party B a large fee if B introduces a purchaser who buys A's property for £6.5 million. If B introduces a purchaser who pays less, is B entitled to a fee?  Commercial contract lawyers David Lowe and Andrew Smith explore the Supreme Court decision in the case of Barton & Ors v Morris & Anor [2023] in which the court declined to imply terms for reasonable remuneration.  A more detailed insight into this case, as well as a full transcript of this podcast, is available on our website: gowlg.co/3IvWN6C    Gowling WLG is an international full-service law firm working across a range of industry sectors including real estate, government, financial services, life sciences and technology. We operate across the world with offices in the UK, Europe, Canada and the Middle East. We regularly talk about a broad range of topics that may be of interest to you. Subscribe to receive our latest articles, podcasts and webinars straight to your inbox: https://gowlg.co/35efH2r  Alternatively, you can view our full selection of insights and resources here: https://gowlg.co/3IwEr41  Want to get to know us? Follow us on: LinkedIn: https://gowlg.co/3hqmatB  Twitter: https://gowlg.co/35Do0nY  Facebook: https://gowlg.co/3th2w8N  Instagram: https://gowlg.co/3ZqYIjD  This podcast may contain information of general interest about current legal issues, but does not give legal advice.