8. Paul Smaldino: Cubist chickens, formal models, and the psychology curriculum episode artwork

EPISODE · Jan 8, 2021 · 1H 19M

8. Paul Smaldino: Cubist chickens, formal models, and the psychology curriculum

from BJKS Podcast

Paul Smaldino is an Associate Professor at the University of California, Merced. His research focus is broad and includes cultural and social evolution, cooperation, and philosophy of science.In this conversation, we focus on Paul's recent papers on modelling, which I have found very useful in my own attempts of getting started with creating formal models.BJKS Podcast is a podcast about neuroscience, psychology, and anything vaguely related, hosted by Benjamin James Kuper-Smith. New conversations every other Friday. You can find the podcast on all podcasting platforms (e.g., Spotify, Apple/Google Podcasts, etc.).Timestamps0:00:20: The parable of the cubist chicken & the need for formal models in psychology0:15:48: Why do psychologists not use formal models more?0:26:23: Models specify the relationship between variables0:40:02: What is the difference between a formal model and a theory?0:50:46: If we add formal modelling to the curriculum, what should we take out?Podcast linksWebsite: https://bjks.buzzsprout.com/Twitter: https://twitter.com/BjksPodcastPaul's linksWebsite: http://smaldino.comGoogle Scholar: https://scholar.google.de/citations?user=AwHfbP0AAAAJTwitter: https://twitter.com/psmaldinoBen's linksWebsite: www.bjks.page/Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user=-nWNfvcAAAAJReferencesEisenberg, E. M. (1984). Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication monographs.Gigerenzer, G. (1977-present). Everything he ever wrote. Every Journal he ever published in.Kauffman, S. A. (1976). Articulation of parts explanation in biology and the rational search for them. In Topics in the Philosophy of Biology (pp. 245-263). Springer, Dordrecht.Muthukrishna, M., & Henrich, J. (2019). A problem in theory. Nature Human Behaviour.Rabin, M. (2013). An approach to incorporating psychology into economics. American Economic Review.Smaldino, P. E. (2017). Models are stupid, and we need more of them. Computational social psychology.Smaldino, P. (2019). Better methods can't make up for mediocre theory. Nature.Smaldino, P. (2020). How to translate a verbal theory into a formal model. Social Psychology. Smaldino, P. (2020). How to Build A Strong Theoretical Foundation. PsyArXiv. Wimsatt, W. C. (1972, January). Complexity and organization. In PSA: Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (Vol. 1972, pp. 67-86). D. Reidel Publishing.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Jan 8, 2021

Embed this episode

Paul Smaldino is an Associate Professor at the University of California, Merced. His research focus is broad and includes cultural and social evolution, cooperation, and philosophy of science. In this conversation, we focus on Paul's recent papers on modelling, which I have found very useful in my own attempts of getting started with creating formal models. BJKS Podcast is a podcast about neuroscience, psychology, and anything vaguely related, hosted by Benjamin James Kuper-Smith. New conve...

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

Ready to play

8. Paul Smaldino: Cubist chickens, formal models, and the psychology curriculum

0:00 1:19:16

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of BJKS Podcast?

This episode is 1 hour and 19 minutes long.

When was this BJKS Podcast episode published?

This episode was published on January 8, 2021.

Can I download this BJKS Podcast episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!