82: More janitors and fewer architects

We answer a listener question on the possible negative consequences of the open science movement—are things moving too quickly? Links and things we discuss in the episode: We have a new logo, if you haven't already noticed... Contact us via our website form! Considering the potential downsides of open science Here come dat boi meme explination The dangers of open access by fiat The role of commercial entities in open science The “University of Oslo fancy Norway people-pay-taxes oil money bloody library” Dropping the success rate of grants to increase the quality of evaluation Reframing open science reform efforts to a mission of equity and fairness We don’t know the process behind university sexual harassment/misconduct investigations Does transparency even matter if people won’t follow up on problems? James' prediction: If someone starts a journal that ONLY does Registered Report, this will be very successful The milkshake duck tweet and an explanation Paul Roos and his “no dickheads” policy Linking DOIs We can't let edge case scenarios, which may not even play out, hobble progress Other links [Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana) [James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers) [Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) [Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/) Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/) Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff! $1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes) Episode citation and permanent link Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, April 15) "More janitors and fewer architects" Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7ZR9J