PodParley PodParley
PodParley
9. Death Penalty in Bangladesh - Violent Protests and Deadly Consequences episode artwork

EPISODE · Dec 7, 2025 · 25 MIN

9. Death Penalty in Bangladesh - Violent Protests and Deadly Consequences

from Amicae Curiae · host Amicae Curiae

Grab your coffee and join us as we take a closer look at one of the most controversial tools of state power: the death penalty. Our starting point is Bangladesh, where a recent death sentence for former prime minister Sheikh Hasina has reignited global debate. But this episode goes far beyond one case.Besides the violations of the right to protest in Bangladesh, we explore why the death penalty is still used in 2025 despite decades of international efforts to abolish it. Does it really deter crime? Why do some governments hold on to it? And how do international courts and human rights bodies react when death sentences raise concerns about fairness or political motives?From wrongful convictions and discrimination to political misuse and global abolition trends, we unpack the legal, moral, and practical reasons why many countries are moving away from capital punishment—and why others are not.Using Bangladesh as a starting point, we ask the bigger questions: Is the death penalty compatible with human rights? What does international law actually say about it? And what does it mean for the right to life today?For questions or corrections, contact us at [email protected].

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Dec 7, 2025

What this episode covers

Grab your coffee and join us as we take a closer look at one of the most controversial tools of state power: the death penalty. Our starting point is Bangladesh, where a recent death sentence for former prime minister Sheikh Hasina has reignited global debate. But this episode goes far beyond one case.Besides the violations of the right to protest in Bangladesh, we explore why the death penalty is still used in 2025 despite decades of international efforts to abolish it. Does it really deter crime? Why do some governments hold on to it? And how do international courts and human rights bodies react when death sentences raise concerns about fairness or political motives?From wrongful convictions and discrimination to political misuse and global abolition trends, we unpack the legal, moral, and practical reasons why many countries are moving away from capital punishment—and why others are not.Using Bangladesh as a starting point, we ask the bigger questions: Is the death penalty compatible with human rights? What does international law actually say about it? And what does it mean for the right to life today?For questions or corrections, contact us at [email protected].

PodParley-generated summary based on available episode metadata and transcript content.

NOW PLAYING

9. Death Penalty in Bangladesh - Violent Protests and Deadly Consequences

0:00 25:17

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

Share this episode

Similar Episodes

The Black, White, and Gray of AI: Ethics, Risks, and Regulation with Guest Cyrus R. Vance Jr.

Jul 1, 2026 ·30m

Beyond Party Lines: The Independent Voters

Apr 17, 2026 ·40m

The Nexus of Global Business Litigation: The New York Commercial Division

Mar 31, 2026 ·43m

Justice Antonin Scalia, A Man in Full: A Conversation with James Rosen

Mar 6, 2026 ·45m

Nuntium post pausam

Feb 22, 2026 ·10m

149-De arte nihil faciendi (dolce far niente)

Feb 22, 2026 ·21m

Similar Podcasts

In Foro Romano In Foro Romano Duae amicae quaque septimana de qua libet re latine loquuntur. Aliquando etiam de aliis linguis loquentes nos audere poteritis vel de diversis argumentis... at lingua Latina semper est hic maximi momenti! NYCLA Amicus Curiae New York County Lawyers Association The New York County Lawyers Association (NYCLA) launched a new podcast series called NYCLA Amicus Curiae. Each month, NYCLA Amicus Curiae's host, Daniel K. Wiig, will host leaders of the bench, bar and legal community for casual and useful conversations to provide listeners a candid view of the innerworkings of the legal profession and those who undertake its charge. LCIL Friday Lecture: 'Foreign Affairs and Domestic Courts' by Lord David Lloyd-Jones This talk will consider the changes which have taken place in recent years in attitudes towards questions of public international law and of foreign affairs when they arise in the context of domestic litigation.David Lloyd Jones, Lord Lloyd-Jones, became a Justice of The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in October 2017.Lord Lloyd-Jones was born and brought up in Pontypridd, Glamorgan. He attended Pontypridd Boys' Grammar School and Downing College, Cambridge of which he was a Fellow from 1975 to 1991. At the Bar his practice included international law, EU law and public law. He was amicus curiae (independent advisor to the court) in the Pinochet litigation before the House of Lords.Lord Lloyd-Jones was appointed to the High Court in 2005. From 2008 to 2011 he served as a Presiding Judge on the Wales Circuit and Chair of the Lord Chancellor's Standing Committee on the Welsh Language. In 2012 he was appointed a Lord Justice of Appeal and from 2012 to 2015 he was Chairman of the LCIL Friday Lecture: 'The Amicus Curiae mechanism at the International Criminal Court' by Prof Sarah Williams Lecture summary: The role of civil society in drafting and the adoption of the Rome Statute for the International Criminal Court (ICC) is well known, as is the contribution of civil society to advocating for states to ratify the Statute and implement its provisions. However, despite the importance of these contributions, such opportunities do not constitute direct participation in the formal proceedings of the ICC. Other than the role of civil society actors as a witness, be it as an expert or a factual witness, there is only one option for direct participation of civil society in ICC proceedings: that is, to participate as an amicus curiae. States, too, have more limited rights of participation in proceedings before the ICC, particularly in comparison to other international institutions. However, the proceedings may raise issues of direct relevance to a state or broader relevance to several states, including states parties and non states-parties. Where the Rome Statute legal framewor

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Amicae Curiae?

This episode is 25 minutes long.

When was this Amicae Curiae episode published?

This episode was published on December 7, 2025.

What is this episode about?

Grab your coffee and join us as we take a closer look at one of the most controversial tools of state power: the death penalty. Our starting point is Bangladesh, where a recent death sentence for former prime minister Sheikh Hasina has reignited...

Can I download this Amicae Curiae episode?

Yes, you can download this episode by clicking the download button on the episode player, or subscribe to the podcast in your preferred podcast app for automatic downloads.
URL copied to clipboard!