9th Circuit in OPEN REBELLION Against Supreme Court on Second Amendment!

This week the 9th Circuit, sitting en banc, granted a request by California's Attorney General to leave in place the state's current ban on standard-capacity magazines.In doing so, they stand in open rebellion against the United States Supreme Court--purportedly their superiors--in their refusal to even pretend to apply the constitutional legal analysis required the the Court's decision in Bruen.Join me today as I read the petulant 6-page majority opinion continuing the denial of Second Amendment rights to law-abiding Californians.Much more importantly, I also read the substantive 36-page dissent which would find the standard-capacity magazine ban unconstitutional. This dissent is a solidly grounded legal analysis deeply sourced in the Supreme Court's modern Second Amendment jurisprudence, including Heller, McDonald, and Bruen.It also reflects appropriate outrage at the feckless 9th Circuit majority.THERE IS ONLY ONE SELF-DEFENSE "INSURANCE" PROVIDER I TRUST!There are lots of self-defense "insurance" companies out there. Some are hot garbage. Some have limited resources. Some are simply, in my view, untrustworthy. But there is ONE that I PERSONALLY TRUST to protect myself and my family.LEARN which ONE I TRUST by clicking HERE:https://lawofselfdefense.com/trustDisclaimer - Content is for educational & entertainment purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice.Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.