A time would come where Dems could commit a crime and get away with it

What this episode covers

00:02 I started predicting it back in March of 2025, a time would come when Democrats could commit just about any crime, including murder in DC, in the DC court district and get away with it. And I've been screaming about the implications of this because Congress is located in DC. You have these juries that are 91 % Democrats. 00:30 That's the vote for Kamala Harris. And two, I didn't come up with this idea. I was shocked when I stumbled upon it. They did. Here's the article, who did? Freedom Trainers. It's a Soros sponsored Democrat NGO that trains people how to get on juries, how to lie once you're on a jury and say you can be fair and then deliver a not. 00:58 guilty verdict or a not indicted, in other words, not charged verdict, because obviously a jury needs to charge somebody before they can go to trial. When did this start? 2024 Democrats began putting this together before Trump took office in anticipation of his term. When do we start seeing things we've never seen before? 25. And the other thing about DC, DC is a small place relatively in terms of who lives there and who could serve on a jury. Okay. 01:27 So what is going on with this judge? Why would he say that? He's woke, he's a friend of Barack Obama. Okay, yeah, he's a lunatic, yeah. He's a fan of Cole Allen, the Trump assassin. That was really clear yesterday. Yeah, but that's not why he did it. 01:45 He's tainting the jury pool. He did it on purpose to taint the jury pool. The jury pool is small. Oh, look at poor Cole Allen, a man of color. Look how he's being treated. He's oppressed. Look what the evil Trump administration is doing. mean, anyone can understand why you'd need to kill him. Oh, did I say that out loud? 02:17 I'm not the only one thinking it. Here's constitutional attorney Mark Smith in all the coverage yesterday. One person has this figured out. He was on Fox when he said this. really is the tip of the iceberg in that it shows that the problems and challenges that the Department of Justice and Jeanine Pirro is going to have in getting a conviction here, even though you have videotape evidence, have admissions, have selfies about what this guy was going to do and then did. 02:44 Still, you are going to be in front of a DC jury, in front of a DC judge, many of whom may have some version of Trump derangement syndrome. And one does wonder if that's going to pose a real challenge to a conviction in this case, despite the apparently strong evidence against Cole Allen here. matter. But I think it is a challenge for the Department of Justice. They're going to have to confront. Yeah, it is a challenge. They're going have to confront it. Do not be surprised if one of two things happen. They can't get an indictment. 03:13 or they can't get an indictment on the most serious charges against coal islands. Or maybe they'll get them on a gun charge, but they won't indict on the longer charge. Don't be surprised. Here's how it works, okay? Federal system, juries have 16 to 23 members, and you need a quorum of at least 16, right? To get an indictment, 12 jurors have to vote in favor. It does not require unanimity. 03:41 In the last three assassination cases, one of the National Guard, he was a liberal lunatic, the other two were Trump um assassination cases. One was a serious one. I'm still worried about the woman they let go. They couldn't get an indictment. Now, here's where you're really, I just, I worry about it. You gotta have unanimity. It's gotta be unanimous for a conviction. I just don't see the left doing that in this case. And if, 04:09 Cole Allen does get convicted of trying to murder or assassinate, remember not just Donald Trump, his entire cabinet, and also liberal journalists, and that's gonna be the hangup. If he just tried to kill Trump, I think they'd let him off. But there were liberal journalists in between Trump and Cole Allen, and that's gonna be the mitigating factor for the lunatics on the jury who will have bee ...