EPISODE · Jun 9, 2025 · 14 MIN
Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., decided June 9, 2025
from CAFC News Brief
The appeal centers on a decision from the District Court for the District of Delaware concerning the validity of a patent claim under the doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting (ODP). The court affirms the lower court's ruling, finding that claim 5 of one patent cannot be used as an ODP reference to invalidate claim 26 of another, citing a recent controlling decision in a similar case. The opinion was decided on June 9, 2025, and is noted as nonprecedential. Read the full case summary here: https://www.cafcnewsbriefs.com/post/acadia-pharmaceuticals-inc-v-aurobindo-pharma-ltd-decided-june-9-2025
What this episode covers
The appeal centers on a decision from the District Court for the District of Delaware concerning the validity of a patent claim under the doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting (ODP). The court affirms the lower court's ruling, finding that claim 5 of one patent cannot be used as an ODP reference to invalidate claim 26 of another, citing a recent controlling decision in a similar case. The opinion was decided on June 9, 2025, and is noted as nonprecedential. Read the full case summary here: https://www.cafcnewsbriefs.com/post/acadia-pharmaceuticals-inc-v-aurobindo-pharma-ltd-decided-june-9-2025
NOW PLAYING
Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., decided June 9, 2025
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
Apr 21, 2026 ·13m
Apr 19, 2026 ·16m
Apr 17, 2026 ·13m
Apr 13, 2026 ·11m
Apr 11, 2026 ·16m