"Activation Oracles: Training and Evaluating LLMs as General-Purpose Activation Explainers" by Sam Marks, Adam Karvonen, James Chua, Subhash Kantamneni, Euan Ong, Julian Minder, Clément Dumas, Owain_Evans episode artwork

EPISODE · Dec 20, 2025 · 20 MIN

"Activation Oracles: Training and Evaluating LLMs as General-Purpose Activation Explainers" by Sam Marks, Adam Karvonen, James Chua, Subhash Kantamneni, Euan Ong, Julian Minder, Clément Dumas, Owain_Evans

from LessWrong (Curated & Popular)

TL;DR: We train LLMs to accept LLM neural activations as inputs and answer arbitrary questions about them in natural language. These Activation Oracles generalize far beyond their training distribution, for example uncovering misalignment or secret knowledge introduced via fine-tuning. Activation Oracles can be improved simply by scaling training data quantity and diversity. The below is a reproduction of our X thread on this paper and the Anthropic Alignment blog post. Thread New paper: We train Activation Oracles: LLMs that decode their own neural activations and answer questions about them in natural language. We find surprising generalization. For instance, our AOs uncover misaligned goals in fine-tuned models, without training to do so. We aim to make a general-purpose LLM for explaining activations by: 1. Training on a diverse set of tasks 2. Evaluating on tasks very different from training This extends prior work (LatentQA) that studied activation verbalization in narrow settings. Our main evaluations are downstream auditing tasks. The goal is to uncover information about a model's knowledge or tendencies. Applying Activation Oracles is easy. Choose the activation (or set of activations) you want to interpret and ask any question you like! We [...] ---Outline:(00:46) Thread(04:49) Blog post(05:27) Introduction(07:29) Method(10:15) Activation Oracles generalize to downstream auditing tasks(13:47) How does Activation Oracle training scale?(15:01) How do Activation Oracles relate to mechanistic approaches to interpretability?(19:31) Conclusion The original text contained 3 footnotes which were omitted from this narration. --- First published: December 18th, 2025 Source: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/rwoEz3bA9ekxkabc7/activation-oracles-training-and-evaluating-llms-as-general --- Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO. ---Images from the article:

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Dec 20, 2025

Embed this episode

TL;DR: We train LLMs to accept LLM neural activations as inputs and answer arbitrary questions about them in natural language. These Activation Oracles generalize far beyond their training distribution, for example uncovering misalignment or secret knowledge introduced via fine-tuning. Activation Oracles can be improved simply by scaling training data quantity and diversity. The below is a reproduction of our X thread on this paper and the Anthropic Alignment blog post. Thread New pap...

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

NOW PLAYING

"Activation Oracles: Training and Evaluating LLMs as General-Purpose Activation Explainers" by Sam Marks, Adam Karvonen, James Chua, Subhash Kantamneni, Euan Ong, Julian Minder, Clément Dumas, Owain_Evans

0:00 20:15

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of LessWrong (Curated & Popular)?

This episode is 20 minutes long.

When was this LessWrong (Curated & Popular) episode published?

This episode was published on December 20, 2025.

Can I download this LessWrong (Curated & Popular) episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!