Adam Dynes on Noisy Retrospection: The Effect of Party Control on Policy Outcomes – #35 episode artwork

EPISODE · Feb 27, 2020 · 1H 2M

Adam Dynes on Noisy Retrospection: The Effect of Party Control on Policy Outcomes – #35

from Manifold · host Steve Hsu

Steve and Corey talk to Adam Dynes of Brigham Young University about whether voting has an effect on policy outcomes. Adam’s work finds that control of state legislatures or governorships does not have an observable effect on macroscopic variables such as crime rates, the economy, etc. Possible explanations: parties push essentially the same policies, politicians don’t keep promises, monied interest control everything. Are voting decisions just noisy mood affiliation? Perhaps time is better spent obsessing about sports teams, which at least generates pleasure.Topics1:22 – What is retrospective voting?5:43 – Research findings on retrospective voting14:02 – Uniparty/Monied interests?17:23 – Martin Gilens’ research23:10 – Are people just voting based on noise or mood affiliation?27:13 – Bryan Caplan – Myth of the Rational Voter34:35 – Is time better spent obsessing about sports teams, which at least generates pleasure?39:42 – After the fall of Athens, was democracy commonly referred to as irrational mob rule?48:22 – Does this research translate to the national level?52:19 – Super Nerdy Stuff: Statistical Analysis, Reproducibility & Null Results56:40 – Reactions to the resultsResourcesTranscriptAdam Dynes (Personal Website)Adam Dynes (Faculty Profile)Noisy Retrospection: The Effect of Party Control on Policy Outcomes Announcing this for some friends at Mechanize - a startup that builds environments for training and evaluating frontier LLMs. Its customers include the top AI labs, and it has contributed to the breakthrough in coding capabilities of frontier models. Mechanize is hiring! https://mechanize.work/b/hsu Compensation is extremely competitive. For technical roles, $300-500k. They are also seeking smart generalists. For example: Research Engineer, Alignment: Build evals that test for misaligned model behaviors  $500K salary Puzzle Maker: Design interesting and original puzzles that LLMs can’t yet solve  $300K salary Mechanize understands that my readership is highly selected. There is a VERY GOOD CHANCE you will be interviewed if you apply via the link above.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Feb 27, 2020

Embed this episode

Steve and Corey talk to Adam Dynes of Brigham Young University about whether voting has an effect on policy outcomes.

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

NOW PLAYING

Adam Dynes on Noisy Retrospection: The Effect of Party Control on Policy Outcomes – #35

0:00 1:02:11

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Manifold?

This episode is 1 hour and 2 minutes long.

When was this Manifold episode published?

This episode was published on February 27, 2020.

Is there a transcript available for this episode?

Yes, a full transcript is available for this episode. You can read the complete transcript on the episode page.

Can I download this Manifold episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!