Agree to Disagree: Are Identity Politics a Way to Win? episode artwork

EPISODE · Dec 11, 2020 · 1H 5M

Agree to Disagree: Are Identity Politics a Way to Win?

from Open to Debate · host Open to Debate

The public and pundits alike are still processing the most recent election, but this much we know: 2020 marks the most diverse Congress in American history, and President Trump garnered more minority voters in 2020 than in 2016. As Georgia faces two runoff elections, which will determine which party controls the Senate, gubernatorial nominee Stacey Abrams and other voting-rights advocates have focused on identity politics as a way to prevail in the electoral process. Is it a winning strategy? Two experts on race and identity in America sit with Intelligence Squared host and moderator John Donvan to debate.   Arguing “YES” is Michael Eric Dyson, an author, New York Times contributing opinion writer, contributing editor of The New Republic, and professor of Sociology at Vanderbilt University. Arguing "NO" is John McWhorter, an author, host of Lexicon Valley, contributing writer at The Atlantic, and professor of Linguistics at Columbia University Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published Dec 11, 2020

Embed this episode

Ready to play

Agree to Disagree: Are Identity Politics a Way to Win?

0:00 1:05:07

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Open to Debate?

This episode is 1 hour and 5 minutes long.

When was this Open to Debate episode published?

This episode was published on December 11, 2020.

Can I download this Open to Debate episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!