AI, Liability, and Hallucinations in a Changing Tech and Law Environment episode artwork

EPISODE · May 15, 2025 · 39 MIN

AI, Liability, and Hallucinations in a Changing Tech and Law Environment

from Stanford Legal · host Stanford Law School

Stanford Law researchers Professor Dan Ho and Mirac Suzgun explore the risks and potential of AI in law --- Since ChatGPT came on the scene, numerous incidents have surfaced involving attorneys submitting court filings riddled with AI-generated hallucinations—plausible-sounding case citations that purport to support key legal propositions but are, in fact, entirely fictitious. As sanctions against attorneys mount, it seems clear there are a few kinks in the tech. Even AI tools designed specifically for lawyers can be prone to hallucinations.  In this episode, we look at the potential and risks of AI-assisted tech in law and policy with two Stanford Law researchers at the forefront of this issue: RegLab Director Professor Daniel Ho and JD/PhD student and computer science researcher Mirac Suzgun. Together with several co-authors, they examine the emerging risks in two recent papers, “Profiling Legal Hallucinations in Large Language Models” (Oxford Journal of Legal Analysis, 2024) and the forthcoming “Hallucination-Free?” in the Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. Ho and Suzgun offer new insights into how legal AI is working, where it’s failing, and what’s at stake. Links: Daniel Ho  >>> Stanford Law page Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI) >>> Stanford University page Regulation, Evaluation, and Governance Lab (RegLab) >>> Stanford University page Connect: Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast Website Stanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn Page Rich Ford >>>  Twitter/X Pam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School Page Stanford Law School >>> Twitter/X Stanford Lawyer Magazine >>> Twitter/X   (00:00:00) Introduction to AI in Legal Education  (00:05:01) AI Tools in Legal Research and Writing (00:12:01) Challenges of AI-Generated Content  (00:20:0) Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (00:30:01) Audience Q&A Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Episode metadata supplied by the publisher feed · Published May 15, 2025

Embed this episode

Stanford Law researchers Professor Dan Ho and Mirac Suzgun explore the risks and potential of AI in law

Distinct summary based on available episode metadata or transcript content.

NOW PLAYING

AI, Liability, and Hallucinations in a Changing Tech and Law Environment

0:00 39:31

No transcript for this episode yet

We transcribe on demand. Request one and we'll notify you when it's ready — usually under 10 minutes.

No similar episodes found.

No similar podcasts found.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long is this episode of Stanford Legal?

This episode is 39 minutes long.

When was this Stanford Legal episode published?

This episode was published on May 15, 2025.

Can I download this Stanford Legal episode?

Yes. Use the download control on the episode player to save the publisher-provided media file.
URL copied to clipboard!