EPISODE · Jun 15, 2022 · 23 MIN
American Hospital Association v. Becerra
from Supreme Court Opinions · host SCOTUS Opinions
The federal government reimburses hospitals for providing outpatient care to patients insured by Medicare Part B. Until recently, the government reimbursed all hospitals at a uniform rate for providing covered drugs. In 2018, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) reduced the reimbursement rates for certain types of hospitals (known as “340B hospitals”) because those hospitals can obtain the covered drugs far more cheaply than other hospitals can. HHS reasoned that it should not reimburse hospitals more than they paid to acquire the drugs. Several 340B hospitals and hospital associations affected by the decision filed a lawsuit challenging HHS’s decision to lower reimbursement rates. The district court ruled that HHS had exceeded its statutory authority by reducing drug reimbursement rates for 340B hospitals, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit reversed, finding that HHS’s decision is based on a reasonable interpretation of the statute. The Court held that The statute does not preclude judicial review of HHS’s reimbursement rates. The Court also held that absent a survey of hospitals’ acquisition costs, HHS may not vary the reimbursement rates only for 340B hospitals. Justice Kavanaugh delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Credit: Oyez, LII Supreme Court Resources, Justia Supreme Court Center, available at: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2021/20-1114
What this episode covers
The federal government reimburses hospitals for providing outpatient care to patients insured by Medicare Part B. Until recently, the government reimbursed all hospitals at a uniform rate for providing covered drugs. In 2018, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) reduced the reimbursement rates for certain types of hospitals (known as “340B hospitals”) because those hospitals can obtain the covered drugs far more cheaply than other hospitals can. HHS reasoned that it should not reimburse hospitals more than they paid to acquire the drugs. Several 340B hospitals and hospital associations affected by the decision filed a lawsuit challenging HHS’s decision to lower reimbursement rates. The district court ruled that HHS had exceeded its statutory authority by reducing drug reimbursement rates for 340B hospitals, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit reversed, finding that HHS’s decision is based on a reasonable interpretation of the statute. The Court held that The statute does not preclude judicial review of HHS’s reimbursement rates. The Court also held that absent a survey of hospitals’ acquisition costs, HHS may not vary the reimbursement rates only for 340B hospitals. Justice Kavanaugh delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Credit: Oyez, LII Supreme Court Resources, Justia Supreme Court Center, available at: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2021/20-1114
NOW PLAYING
American Hospital Association v. Becerra
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
Jun 20, 2026 ·31m
Jun 20, 2026 ·24m
Jun 20, 2026 ·42m
Jun 20, 2026 ·26m
Jun 20, 2026 ·22m
Jun 20, 2026 ·37m