EPISODE · May 31, 2020
Analysis of NHK Spring
from Finnegan Intellectual Property Law Podcasts · host Daniel C. Cooley, Justin E. Loffredo
The U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decided in NHK Spring that the stage of a parallel district court litigation can justify denying institution of a petition for inter partes review (IPR). The PTAB based its decision on the statutory discretion provided under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a). The PTAB’s decision to designate NHK Spring precedential has affected subsequent post-grant challenges involving concurrent district court litigation. In this article, Finnegan attorneys Dan Cooley and Justin Loffredo explore § 314(a) and the possible effects of the PTAB’s precedential NHK Spring opinion. Read the full article here.
Embed this episode
NOW PLAYING
Analysis of NHK Spring
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.