EPISODE · Aug 12, 2025 · 1H 3M
Apologetics Isn’t About Winning Arguments—Here’s What Matters Most | Weighed in the Balance Ep. 18
from Weighed in the Balance · host Jonathan Brooks & Co
Send us Fan MailToo often, apologetics gets reduced to an intellectual arm-wrestling match—who’s the smartest, the quickest, or the best at dropping “gotcha” questions. But that’s not what biblical apologetics is for. In this episode of Weighed in the Balance, Jonathan Brooks and Josh Goodwin unpack why the goal of defending the faith isn’t to crush an opponent but to faithfully represent Christ. Along the way, they walk through the three major approaches to apologetics—the evidentialist approach, the classical approach, and the presuppositional approach—highlighting their strengths, limitations, and how each one shapes the way we engage with skeptics. You’ll hear how the heart behind your defense matters just as much as the method you choose, why humility is more persuasive than arrogance, and how to balance truth and love in conversations about the gospel.Support the showDo you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!! Click here to find us everywhere!!
Embed this episode
What this episode covers
Send us Fan Mail Too often, apologetics gets reduced to an intellectual arm-wrestling match—who’s the smartest, the quickest, or the best at dropping “gotcha” questions. But that’s not what biblical apologetics is for. In this episode of Weighed in the Balance, Jonathan Brooks and Josh Goodwin unpack why the goal of defending the faith isn’t to crush an opponent but to faithfully represent Christ. Along the way, they walk through the three major approaches to apologetics—the evidentialist app...
Ready to play
Apologetics Isn’t About Winning Arguments—Here’s What Matters Most | Weighed in the Balance Ep. 18
No transcript for this episode yet
Similar Episodes
No similar episodes found.
Similar Podcasts
No similar podcasts found.